Impact of temperature on larval development and evolution of physiological indices in Crassostrea gigas

The effect of four temperatures, ranging between 17 degrees C and 32 degrees C, was studied on development and lipid reserve management of Crassostrea gigas larvae. No effect of temperature was found on larval mortality, as high survival (>90%) was recorded before competence at all temperatures studied. Temperature did, nonetheless, have a strong effect on growth and settlement success. At low temperature (17 degrees C), larvae competent to metamorphose were only observed from day 23 and only a low percentage finally achieved metamorphosis (12%). The opposite was seen at temperatures >= 27 degrees C: larval competence appeared at day 18 and led to high rates of metamorphosis (60-90%). This difference at settlement seemed to be linked to larval growth, which showed rates of 7 mu m d(-1) at 17 degrees C vs. 10.5 mu m d(-1) at 32 degrees C. In addition, a higher accumulation of lipid reserves at low temperature was revealed by both biochemical (TAG/ST) and colorimetric (OLI) methods. In fact, the lower the temperature, the higher the mean TAG/ST levels recorded (6-9 at 17 degrees C vs. 2-4 at 32 degrees C). In the same way, larvae reared at 17 degrees C had a percentage lipid surface coverage between 19 and 29% (at sizes between 80 and 230 mu m), while lipids covered only 5 to 16% of the surface of larvae reared at 32 degrees C (at size <250 mu m). Neither of these physiological indices can, however, provide a relevant indication of the larval performance induced by different rearing temperatures. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keyword(s)

Crassostrea gigas, Larvae, Growth, Metamorphosis, Temperature, Lipids, Physiological indices

Full Text

FilePagesSizeAccess
Publisher's official version
4300 Ko
Author's final draft
978 Ko
How to cite
Ben Kheder Rym, Moal Jeanne, Robert Rene (2010). Impact of temperature on larval development and evolution of physiological indices in Crassostrea gigas. Aquaculture. 309 (1-4). 286-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.09.005, https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00019/13046/

Copy this text