Estimating the biodiversity of the East Antarctic shelf and oceanic zone for ecoregionalisation: Example of the ichthyofauna of the CEAMARC (Collaborative East Antarctic Marine Census) CAML surveys

Type Article
Date 2010-08
Language English
Author(s) Koubbi Philippe1, 2, Ozouf-Costaz Catherine3, Goarant Anne1, 2, Moteki Masato4, Hulley Percy-Alexander5, Causse Romain6, Dettai Agnes3, Duhamel Guy6, Pruvost Patrice6, Tavernier Eric7, Post Alexandra L.8, Beaman Robin J.9, Rintoul Stephen R.10, Hirawake Toru11, Hirano Daisuke4, Ishimaru Takashi4, Riddle Martin12, Hosie Graham12
Affiliation(s) 1 : Univ Paris 06, Lab Oceanog Villefranche, UMR 7093, F-06234 Villefranche Sur Mer, France.
2 : LOV, CNRS, UMR 7093, F-06234 Villefranche Sur Mer, France.
3 : Museum Natl Hist Nat, CNRS UMR Systemat Adaptat Evolut 7138, F-75231 Paris 05, France.
4 : Tokyo Univ Marine Sci & Technol, Fac Marine Sci, Minato Ku, Tokyo 1088477, Japan.
5 : Iziko South African Museum, ZA-8000 Cape Town, South Africa.
6 : MNHN, DMPA UMR 5178, F-75005 Paris, France.
7 : IUT Calais Boulogne, Dept Genie Biol, ULCO, F-62327 Boulogne Sur Mer, France.
8 : Geosci Australia, Marine & Coastal Environm Grp, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
9 : James Cook Univ, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Cairns, Qld 4870, Australia.
10 : CSIRO, Ctr Australian Weather & Climate Res, Antarctic Climate & Ecosyst Cooperat Res Ctr, Wealth Oceans Natl Res Flagship,Marine Labs,Div O, Hobart, Tas 07001, Australia.
11 : Hokkaido Univ, Grad Sch Fisheries Sci, Hakodate, Hokkaido, Japan.
12 : Australian Antarctic Div, Dept Environm Water Heritage & Arts, Kingston, Tas 7050, Australia.
Source Polar Science (1873-9652) (Elsevier Science Bv), 2010-08 , Vol. 4 , N. 2 , P. 115-133
DOI 10.1016/j.polar.2010.04.012
WOS© Times Cited 35
Note In : Antarctic Biology in the 21st Century - Advances in and beyond IPY
Keyword(s) East Antarctic shelf, Ichthyofauna, Ecoregionalisation, Generalized dissimilarity modeling, Dumont d'Urville Sea
Abstract Ecoregions are defined in terms of community structure as a function of abiotic or even anthropogenic forcing. They are meso-scale structures defined as the potential habitat of a species or the predicted communities geographic extent. We assume that they can be more easily defined for long-lived species, such as benthos or neritic fish, in the marine environment. Uncertainties exist for the pelagic realm because of its higher variability, plus little is known about the meso- and bathypelagic zones. A changing environment and modification of habitats will probably drive new communities from plankton to fish or top predators. We need baseline studies, such as those of the Census of Antarctic Marine Life, and databases like SCAR-MarBIN as tools for integrating all of these observations. Our objective is to understand the biodiversity patterns in the Southern Ocean and how these might change through time
Full Text
File Pages Size Access
Publisher's official version 19 1 MB Open access
Top of the page

How to cite 

Koubbi Philippe, Ozouf-Costaz Catherine, Goarant Anne, Moteki Masato, Hulley Percy-Alexander, Causse Romain, Dettai Agnes, Duhamel Guy, Pruvost Patrice, Tavernier Eric, Post Alexandra L., Beaman Robin J., Rintoul Stephen R., Hirawake Toru, Hirano Daisuke, Ishimaru Takashi, Riddle Martin, Hosie Graham (2010). Estimating the biodiversity of the East Antarctic shelf and oceanic zone for ecoregionalisation: Example of the ichthyofauna of the CEAMARC (Collaborative East Antarctic Marine Census) CAML surveys. Polar Science, 4(2), 115-133. Publisher's official version : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2010.04.012 , Open Access version : https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00236/34740/