Evidence for marine production of monoterpenes
Type | Article | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date | 2008 | ||||||||
Language | English | ||||||||
Author(s) | Yassaa Noureddine1, 2, Peeken Ilka3, Zoellner Eckart3, Bluhm Katrin3, Arnold Steve4, Spracklen Dominick4, Williams Jonathan1 | ||||||||
Affiliation(s) | 1 : Max Planck Inst Chem, Air Chem Dept, D-55020 Mainz, Germany. 2 : Univ Sci & Technol Houari Boumediene, Fac Chem, Algiers 16111, Algeria. 3 : Univ Kiel, Leibniz Inst Marine Sci, IFM, GEOMAR, D-24105 Kiel, Germany. 4 : Univ Leeds, Sch Earth & Environm, Inst Climate & Atmospher Sci, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England. |
||||||||
Source | Environmental Chemistry (1448-2517) (Csiro Publishing), 2008 , Vol. 5 , N. 6 , P. 391-401 | ||||||||
DOI | 10.1071/EN08047 | ||||||||
WOS© Times Cited | 109 | ||||||||
Keyword(s) | algae, isoprene, organic trace gases, Southern Atlantic Ocean | ||||||||
Abstract | Laboratory incubation experiments and shipboard measurements on the Southern Atlantic Ocean have provided the first evidence for marine production of monoterpenes. Nine marine phytoplankton monocultures were investigated using a GC-MS equipped with an enantiomerically-selective column and found to emit at rates, expressed as nmol C(10)H(16) (monoterpene) g [chlorophyll a](-1) day(-1), from 0.3 nmol g [chlorophyll a](-1) day(-1) for Skeletonema costatum and Emiliania huxleyi to 225.9 nmol g [chlorophyll a](-1) day(-1) for Dunaliella tertiolecta. Nine monoterpenes were identified in the sample and not in the control, namely: (-)-/(+)-pinene, myrcene, (+)-camphene, (-)-sabinene, (+)-3-carene, (-)-pinene, (-)-limonene and p-ocimene. In addition, shipboard measurements of monoterpenes in air were made in January - March 2007, over the South Atlantic Ocean. Monoterpenes were detected in marine air sufficiently far from land as to exclude influence from terrestrial sources. Maximum levels of 100-200 pptv total monoterpenes were encountered when the ship crossed an active phytoplankton bloom, whereas in low chlorophyll regions monoterpenes were mostly below detection limit. | ||||||||
Full Text |
|