Global surface-ocean pCO2 and sea–air CO2 flux variability from an observation-driven ocean mixed-layer scheme

Type Article
Date 2013
Language English
Author(s) Roedenbeck C.1, Keeling R. F.2, Bakker D. C. E.3, Metz N.4, Olsen A.5, 6, 7, Sabine C.8, Heimann M.1
Affiliation(s) 1 : Max Planck Inst Biogeochem, D-07745 Jena, Germany.
2 : Univ Calif San Diego, Scripps Inst Oceanog, San Diego, CA 92103 USA.
3 : Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England.
4 : CNRS, LOCEAN IPSL, Paris, France.
5 : Inst Marine Res, N-5024 Bergen, Norway.
6 : Uni Bjerknes Ctr, Bergen, Norway.
7 : Bjerknes Ctr Climate Res, Bergen, Norway.
8 : NOAA, Pacific Marine Environm Lab, Seattle, WA 98115 USA.
Source Ocean Science (1812-0784) (Copernicus Gesellschaft Mbh), 2013 , Vol. 9 , N. 2 , P. 193-216
DOI 10.5194/os-9-193-2013
WOS© Times Cited 118
Abstract A temporally and spatially resolved estimate of the global surface-ocean CO2 partial pressure field and the sea–air CO2 flux is presented, obtained by fitting a simple data-driven diagnostic model of ocean mixed-layer biogeochemistry to surface-ocean CO2 partial pressure data from the SOCAT v1.5 database. Results include seasonal, interannual, and short-term (daily) variations. In most regions, estimated seasonality is well constrained from the data, and compares well to the widely used monthly climatology by Takahashi et al. (2009). Comparison to independent data tentatively supports the slightly higher seasonal variations in our estimates in some areas. We also fitted the diagnostic model to atmospheric CO2 data. The results of this are less robust, but in those areas where atmospheric signals are not strongly influenced by land flux variability, their seasonality is nevertheless consistent with the results based on surface-ocean data. From a comparison with an independent seasonal climatology of surface-ocean nutrient concentration, the diagnostic model is shown to capture relevant surface-ocean biogeochemical processes reasonably well. Estimated interannual variations will be presented and discussed in a companion paper.
Full Text
File Pages Size Access
Publisher's official version 24 4 MB Open access
Supplementary material 18 4 MB Open access
Preprint 54 2 MB Open access
Supplement to the preprint 14 3 MB Open access
Top of the page