High resolution mass spectrometry for quantitative analysis and untargeted screening of algal toxins in mussels and passive samplers

Type Article
Date 2015-10
Language English
Author(s) Zendong Suzie Zita1, 3, McCarron Pearse2, Herrenknecht Christine3, Sibat ManoellaORCID1, Amzil Zouher1, Cole Richard B.4, Hess PhilippORCID1
Affiliation(s) 1 : IFREMER, Lab Phycotoxines, F-44311 Nantes, France.
2 : Natl Res Council Canada, Biotoxin Metrol Measurement Sci & Stand, Halifax, NS B3H 3Z1, Canada.
3 : Univ Nantes, LUNAM, MMS EA2160, Fac Pharm, F-44035 Nantes, France.
4 : Univ Paris 06, UMR 8232, Inst Parisien Chim Mol, F-75252 Paris, France.
Source Journal Of Chromatography A (0021-9673) (Elsevier Science Bv), 2015-10 , Vol. 1416 , P. 10-21
DOI 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.08.064
WOS© Times Cited 33
Keyword(s) Monitoring, Marine toxins, Passive sampling, SPATT, Matrix effects
Abstract Measurement of marine algal toxins has traditionally focussed on shellfish monitoring while, over the last decade, passive sampling has been introduced as a complementary tool for exploratory studies. Since 2011, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has been adopted as the EU reference method (No.15/2011) for detection and quantitation of lipophilic toxins. Traditional LC-MS approaches have been based on low-resolution mass spectrometry (LRMS), however, advances in instrument platforms have led to a heightened interest in the use of high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) for toxin detection. This work describes the use of HRMS in combination with passive sampling as a progressive approach to marine algal toxin surveys. Experiments focused on comparison of LRMS and HRMS for determination of a broad range of toxins in shellfish and passive samplers.

Matrix effects are an important issue to address in LC-MS; therefore, this phenomenon was evaluated for mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) and passive samplers using LRMS (triple quadrupole) and HRMS (quadrupole time-of-flight and Orbitrap) instruments. Matrix-matched calibration solutions containing okadaic acid and dinophysistoxins, pectenotoxin, azaspiracids, yessotoxins, domoic acid, pinnatoxins, gymnodimine A and 13-desmethyl spirolide C were prepared. Similar matrix effects were observed on all instruments types. Most notably, there was ion enhancement for pectenotoxins, okadaic acid/dinophysistoxins on one hand, and ion suppression for yessotoxins on the other. Interestingly, the ion selected for quantitation of PTX2 also influenced the magnitude of matrix effects, with the sodium adduct typically exhibiting less susceptibility to matrix effects than the ammonium adduct. As expected, mussel as a biological matrix, quantitatively produced significantly more matrix effects than passive sampler extracts, irrespective of toxin. Sample dilution was demonstrated as an effective measure to reduce matrix effects for all compounds, and was found to be particularly useful for the non-targeted approach.

Limits of detection and method accuracy were comparable between the systems tested, demonstrating the applicability of HRMS as an effective tool for screening and quantitative analysis. HRMS offers the advantage of untargeted analysis, meaning that datasets can be retrospectively analysed. HRMS (full scan) chromatograms of passive samplers yielded significantly less complex data sets than mussels, and were thus more easily screened for unknowns. Consequently, we recommend the use of HRMS in combination with passive sampling for studies investigating emerging or hitherto uncharacterised toxins.
Full Text
File Pages Size Access
Author's final draft 26 1 MB Open access
12 1 MB Access on demand
Top of the page

How to cite 

Zendong Suzie Zita, McCarron Pearse, Herrenknecht Christine, Sibat Manoella, Amzil Zouher, Cole Richard B., Hess Philipp (2015). High resolution mass spectrometry for quantitative analysis and untargeted screening of algal toxins in mussels and passive samplers. Journal Of Chromatography A, 1416, 10-21. Publisher's official version : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2015.08.064 , Open Access version : https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00277/38848/