ARCHIMER

Archive Institutionnelle de l'Ifremer

ARCHIMER

search DOI 10.1029/01EO00186

Deep-penetration heat flow probes raise questions about interpretations from shorter probes

Full Text

FilePagesSizeAccess
Publisher's official version
22 Mo
Download
How to cite
Géli Louis, Turon J.-L., Aslanian Daniel, Balut Y., Beuzart Paul, Cochran J., Francheteau J., Harmegnies Francois, Landuré Jean-Yves, Le Suavé Raymond, Mazaud A., Michel E., Normand Alain, Pichon Jack, Vlastelic Ivan (2001). Deep-penetration heat flow probes raise questions about interpretations from shorter probes. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. 82 (29). 317-317. https://doi.org/10.1029/01EO00186, https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00288/39943/

Copy this text

Oceanographic cruises
MD 120 / ANTAUS
Related documents
Davis Earl E., Wang Kelin, Becker Keir (2002). Comment [on “Deep-penetration heat flow probes raise questions about interpretations from shorter probes” by Géli et al.]. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 83 (18), 196-197. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002EO000134
Géli Louis, Francheteau Jean, Labails Cinthia (2002). Reply [to “Comments on “Deep-Penetration Heat Flow Probes Raise Questions About Interpretations From Shorter Probes’”]. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. 83 (18). 197-199. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002EO000135
ContactAboutLegal noticeRSSTwitterOAI-PMH