When and why sediments fail to record the geomagnetic field during polarity reversals

Type Article
Date 2016-11
Language English
Author(s) Valet Jean-Pierre1, Meynadier Laure1, Simon Quentin2, Thouveny Nicolas2
Affiliation(s) 1 : Univ Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cite, Inst Phys Globe Paris, UMR 7154,CNRS, F-75238 Paris 05, France.
2 : Aix Marseille Univ, CEREGE, UMR 34, CNRS,IRD, F-13545 Aix En Provence, France.
Source Earth And Planetary Science Letters (0012-821X) (Elsevier Science Bv), 2016-11 , Vol. 453 , P. 96-107
DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.07.055
WOS© Times Cited 26
Keyword(s) geomagnetic reversals, magnetization acquisition, rock magnetism, sediment, demagnetization
Abstract We present four new records of the Matuyama–Brunhes (M–B) reversal from sediments of the Equatorial Indian Ocean, West Equatorial Pacific and North Atlantic Oceans with deposition rates between 2 cm/kyr and 4.5 cm/kyr. The magnetic measurements were performed using 8 cc cubic samples and provided well-defined reverse and normal polarity directions prior and after the last reversal. In three records stepwise demagnetization of the transitional samples revealed a succession of scattered directions instead of a well-defined characteristic component of magnetization. There is no relationship with changes in magnetic mineralogy, magnetic concentration and magnetic grain sizes. This behavior could be caused by weakly magnetized sediment. However the transitional samples of two cores have almost three orders of magnitude stronger magnetizations than the non-transitional samples that yielded unambiguous primary directions in the other two cores. Moreover a similar proportion of magnetic grains was aligned in all records. Therefore, the large amount of magnetic grains oriented by the weak transitional field did not contribute to improve the definition of the characteristic component. We infer that the weakness of the field might not be only responsible. Assuming that the transitional period is dominated by a multipolar field, it is likely that the rapidly moving non-dipole components generated different directions that were recorded over the 2 cm stratigraphic thickness of each sample. These components are carried by grains with similar magnetic properties yielding scattered directions during demagnetization. In contrast, the strongly magnetized sediments of the fourth core from the West Equatorial Pacific Ocean were exempt of problems during demagnetization. The declinations rotate smoothly between the two polarities while the inclinations remain close to zero. This scenario results from post-depositional realignment that integrated various amounts of pre- and post-transitional magnetic directions within each sample. The present results point out the impossibility of extracting reliable information on geomagnetic reversals from low-medium deposition rate sediments with the current sampling techniques. Among other features, they put in question the relationship between reversal duration and site latitude.
Full Text
File Pages Size Access
Publisher's official version 12 1 MB Open access
Fig. S1. Stereographic projections of the successive directions and evolution of samples magnetic moments measured during af demagnetization for each sample close and ... 1 511 KB Open access
Fig. S2. Same as Fig. S1 for core MD90-961. 1 374 KB Open access
Fig. S3. Same as Fig. S1 for core MD98-2183. 1 391 KB Open access
Fig. S4. Stereographic projection of all transitional samples successive directions from core MD98-2183 at each demagnetization step. 1 152 KB Open access
Top of the page