From population connectivity to the art of striping Russian dolls: the lessons from Pocillopora corals

Type Article
Date 2018-01
Language English
Author(s) Gelin Pauline1, Fauvelot Cecile2, Bigot Lionel1, Baly Joseph2, Magalon Helene1
Affiliation(s) 1 : Univ La Reunion, ENTROPIE, CNRS, UMR,IRD, St Denis, La Reunion, France.
2 : Univ La Reunion, Ctr IRD Noumea, CNRS, UMR,ENTROPIE,IRD, Noumea, New Caledonia.
Source Ecology And Evolution (2045-7758) (Wiley), 2018-01 , Vol. 8 , N. 2 , P. 1411-1426
DOI 10.1002/ece3.3747
WOS© Times Cited 18
Keyword(s) Bayesian assignments, cluster, DAPC, microsatellites, Pocillopora, scleractinian
Abstract

Here, we examined the genetic variability in the coral genus Pocillopora, in particular within the Primary Species Hypothesis PSH09, identified by Gélin, Postaire, Fauvelot and Magalon (2017) using species delimitation methods [also named Pocillopora eydouxi/meandrina complex sensu, Schmidt-Roach, Miller, Lundgren, & Andreakis (2014)] and which was found to split into three secondary species hypotheses (SSH09a, SSH09b, and SSH09c) according to assignment tests using multi-locus genotypes (13 microsatellites). From a large sampling (2,507 colonies) achieved in three marine provinces [Western Indian Ocean (WIO), Tropical Southwestern Pacific (TSP), and Southeast Polynesia (SEP)], genetic structuring analysis conducted with two clustering analyses (Structure and DAPC) using 13 microsatellites revealed that SSH09a was restricted to the WIO while SSH09b and SSH09c were almost exclusively in the TSP and SEP. More surprisingly, each SSH split into two to three genetically differentiated clusters, found in sympatry at the reef scale, leading to a pattern of nested hierarchical levels (PSH > SSH > cluster), each level hiding highly differentiated genetic groups. Thus, rather than structured populations within a single species, these three SSHs, and even the eight clusters, likely represent distinct genetic lineages engaged in a speciation process or real species. The issue is now to understand which hierarchical level (SSH, cluster, or even below) corresponds to the species one. Several hypotheses are discussed on the processes leading to this pattern of mixed clusters in sympatry, evoking formation of reproductive barriers, either by allopatric speciation or habitat selection.

Full Text
File Pages Size Access
Publisher's official version 16 968 KB Open access
Appendix S1 1 99 KB Open access
Appendix S2 1 240 KB Open access
Appendix S3 1 187 KB Open access
Appendix S4 1 187 KB Open access
Appendix S5 1 195 KB Open access
Appendix S6 1 7 KB Open access
Top of the page