Modeling reproductive traits of an invasive bivalve species under contrasting climate scenarios from 1960 to 2100

Type Article
Date 2019-01
Language English
Author(s) Gourault Melaine6, Petton SebastienORCID1, Thomas Yoann2, Pecquerie Laure2, Marques Goncalo M.3, Cassou Christophe4, Fleury ElodieORCID5, Paulet Yves-Marie6, Pouvreau StephaneORCID1
Affiliation(s) 1 : IFREMER, Lab Sci Environm Marin LEMAR, 11 Presquile Vivier, F-29840 Argenton En Landunvez, France.
2 : IFREMER, Lab Sci Environm Marin LEMAR, UBO, CNRS,IRD, Plouzane, France.
3 : Univ Lisbon, MARETEC, Inst Super Tecn, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal.
4 : CERFACS, F-31057 Toulouse 01, France.
5 : IFREMER, Lab Sci Environm Marin LEMAR, F-29280 Plouzane, France.
Source Journal Of Sea Research (1385-1101) (Elsevier Science Bv), 2019-01 , Vol. 143 , P. 128-139
DOI 10.1016/j.seares.2018.05.005
WOS© Times Cited 1
Keyword(s) DEB model, IPCC scenarios, Reproductive traits, Crassostrea gigas, Bay of Brest
Abstract

Identifying the drivers that control the reproductive success of a population is vital to forecasting the consequences of climate change in terms of distribution shift and population dynamics. In the present study, we aimed to improve our understanding of the environmental conditions that allowed the colonization of the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas, in the Bay of Brest since its introduction in the 1960s. We also aimed to evaluate the potential consequences of future climate change on its reproductive success and further expansion.

Three reproductive traits were defined to study the success of the reproduction: the spawning occurrence, synchronicity among individuals and individual fecundity. We simulated these traits by applying an individual-based modeling approach using a Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) model. First, the model was calibrated for C. gigas in the Bay of Brest using a 6-year monitoring dataset (2009–2014). Second, we reconstructed past temperature conditions since 1960 in order to run the model backwards (hindcasting analysis) and identified the emergence of conditions that favored increasing reproductive success. Third, we explored the regional consequences of two contrasting IPCC climate scenarios (RCP2.6 and RCP8.5) on the reproductive success of this species in the bay for the 2100 horizon (forecasting analysis). In both analyses, since phytoplankton concentration variations were, at that point, unknown in the past and unpredicted in the future, we made an initial assumption that our six years of observed phytoplankton concentrations were informative enough to represent “past and future possibilities” of phytoplankton dynamics in the Bay of Brest. Therefore, temperature is the variable that we modified under each forecasting and hindcasting runs.

The hindcasting simulations showed that the spawning events increased after 1995, which agrees with the observations made on C. gigas colonization. The forecasting simulations showed that under the warmer scenario (RCP8.5), reproductive success would be enhanced through two complementary mechanisms: more regular spawning each year and potentially precocious spawning resulting in a larval phase synchronized with the most favorable summer period. Our results evidenced that the spawning dates and synchronicity between individuals mainly relied on phytoplankton seasonal dynamics, and not on temperature as expected. Future research focused on phytoplankton dynamics under different climate change scenarios would greatly improve our ability to anticipate the reproductive success and population dynamics of this species and other similar invertebrates.

Full Text
File Pages Size Access
12 2 MB Access on demand
16 614 KB Access on demand
Author's final draft 51 1 MB Open access
Top of the page

How to cite 

Gourault Melaine, Petton Sebastien, Thomas Yoann, Pecquerie Laure, Marques Goncalo M., Cassou Christophe, Fleury Elodie, Paulet Yves-Marie, Pouvreau Stephane (2019). Modeling reproductive traits of an invasive bivalve species under contrasting climate scenarios from 1960 to 2100. Journal Of Sea Research, 143, 128-139. Publisher's official version : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2018.05.005 , Open Access version : https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00440/55188/