Evidence of pervasive trans-tensional deformation in the northwestern Wharton Basin in the 2012 earthquakes rupture area

Type Article
Date 2018-11
Language English
Author(s) Hananto Nugroho1, Boudarine Asmoune2, Carton Helene2, Singh Satish C.2, 5, Avianto Praditya1, Dyment Jerome2, Qin Yanfang2, Ghosal Dibakar3, Zuraida Rina4, Tapponnier Paul E.5, Deplus Christine2, Sieh Kerry5
Affiliation(s) 1 : Indonesian Inst Sci, Res Ctr Oceanog, Jl Pasir Putih 1 Ancol Timur, Jakarta 14430, Utara, Indonesia.
2 : Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cite, Inst Phys Globe Paris, Equipe Geosci Marines,CNRS, 1 Rue Jussieu, F-75238 Paris 05, France.
3 : Indian Inst Technol, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
4 : Marine Geol Inst, Jl DR Junjunan 236, Bandung, Indonesia.
5 : Nanyang Technol Univ, Earth Observ Singapore, N2-01A-XX,50 Nanyang Ave, Singapore 639798, Singapore.
Source Earth And Planetary Science Letters (0012-821X) (Elsevier Science Bv), 2018-11 , Vol. 502 , P. 174-186
DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.09.007
WOS© Times Cited 12
Keyword(s) the 2012 Indian Ocean earthquake, diffuse deformation, Wharton Basin, plate bending, shear zones, normal faults
Abstract

The Wharton Basin in the Indian Ocean is one of the most extensively deforming ocean basins, as confirmed by the occurrence of several very large earthquakes starting from January 12, 2012 with Mw 7.2 followed by the great earthquakes of April 11, 2012 with Mw 8.6 and Mw 8.2. Although the Mw 7.2 and Mw 8.2 earthquakes seem to have ruptured the re-activated N–S striking fracture zones, the largest event (Mw 8.6) required the rupturing of several faults, oblique to each other, in a very complex manner. In order to understand the nature of deformation in these earthquakes rupture zones, we recently acquired 90 000 km2 of bathymetry, 11 400 km of sub-bottom profiling, gravity and magnetic data covering the rupture areas of the 2012 earthquakes east of the Ninety-East Ridge, in the northwestern Wharton Basin. These new data reveal six N8°E striking re-activated fracture zones (F5b, F6a, f6b, F7a, F7b and F8), where the fracture zone F6a can be followed for over 400 km and seems to be most active. The epicenters of the Mw 8.6 and Mw 8.2 earthquakes lie on the fracture zones F6a and F7b, respectively. The newly observed fracture F5b in the east is short, and has an extensional basin at its southern tip. The fracture zone F8 defines the eastern boundary of the Ninety-East Ridge. The presence of en echelon faults and pull-apart basins indicate left-lateral motion along these fracture zones. In between these fracture zones, we observe pervasive 290° striking right-lateral shear zones at 4–8 km intervals; one of which has cut through a seamount that might have ruptured during the Mw 8.6 earthquake. We also observe another N20°E striking left-lateral shear zones in the vicinity of F7b and F8, which is coincident with the strike of one of the nodal planes of the Mw 8.6 focal mechanism. These N20°E striking shear zones are interpreted as R Riedel shears and the N290°E striking shear zones as R′ Riedel shears. These shear zones are formed by a series of N335°E striking en echelon normal faults. Our data also show the presence of N65°E striking thrust faults east of the Ninety-East Ridge, orthogonal to the regional principal direction of compression. Furthermore, extensive bending-related faulting is also observed close to the Sumatra trench with normal faults also striking at N335°E, similar to the normal faults that form the shear zones. Normal faults with a similar orientation are also present at the southern tip of F5b. We explain all these observations with a single coherent model of deformation in the Wharton Basin, where a dominant part of the regional NW–SE compressional stress is accommodated along the N8°E re-activated fracture zones, and the rest is distributed along shear zones, thrust and normal faults between these fracture zones. The thrust and normal faults are orthogonal to each other and define the direction of principal compressive and extensive stresses in the region whereas the two shear zone systems form a conjugate pair.

Full Text
File Pages Size Access
Publisher's official version 13 6 MB Open access
Fig. S1. Bathymetry track lines (profiles 1 to 22). Yellow line indicates the 3.5 kHz image shown in Fig. 3c, and red lines in different figures as indicated by the black arrows. 1 MB Open access
Fig. S2. 3.5 kHz image crossing northern segment of F6a. Also contains shear zones and bending-related faults. See Figs. 4 and S1 for the location of the image. The blue curve indicates the seafloor a 1 MB Open access
Fig. S3. 3.5 kHz images across bend faults (a) and extensional basin (b) showing graben and normal faults. See Figs. 6 and S1 for the location of the images. The blue curve indicates the seafloor and 1 MB Open access
Fig. S4. 3.5 kHz image of the WNW shear zones. See Fig. S1 for the location of the image. The blue curve indicates the seafloor and yellow curve a sediment reflection. The locations of faults are mark 602 KB Open access
Top of the page

How to cite 

Hananto Nugroho, Boudarine Asmoune, Carton Helene, Singh Satish C., Avianto Praditya, Dyment Jerome, Qin Yanfang, Ghosal Dibakar, Zuraida Rina, Tapponnier Paul E., Deplus Christine, Sieh Kerry (2018). Evidence of pervasive trans-tensional deformation in the northwestern Wharton Basin in the 2012 earthquakes rupture area. Earth And Planetary Science Letters, 502, 174-186. Publisher's official version : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2018.09.007 , Open Access version : https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00456/56738/