Ultrastructure and distribution of kleptoplasts in benthic foraminifera from shallow-water (photic) habitats

Type Article
Date 2018-01
Language English
Author(s) Jauffrais ThierryORCID1, Lekieffre Charlotte2, Koho Karoliina A.3, Tsuchiya Masashi4, Schweizer Magali1, Bernhard Joan M.5, Meibom Anders2, 6, Geslin Emmanuelle1
Affiliation(s) 1 : Univ Angers, UMR CNRS LPG BIAF 6112, Bioindicateurs Actuels & Fossiles, 2 Blvd Lavoisier, F-49045 Angers 1, France.
2 : Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Sch Architecture Civil & Environm Engn ENAC, Lab Biol Geochem, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
3 : Univ Helsinki, Dept Environm Sci, Viikinkaari 1, Helsinki, Finland.
4 : Japan Agcy Marine Earth Sci & Technol, Dept Marine Biodivers Res, 2-15 Natsushima Cho, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan.
5 : Woods Hole Oceanog Inst, Dept Geol & Geophys, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA.
6 : Univ Lausanne, Inst Earth Sci, Ctr Adv Surface Anal, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Source Marine Micropaleontology (0377-8398) (Elsevier Science Bv), 2018-01 , Vol. 138 , P. 46-62
DOI 10.1016/j.marmicro.2017.10.003
WOS© Times Cited 25
Keyword(s) Kleptoplasty, Probst, Chloroplast, TEM, Transmission electron microscope
Abstract

cAssimilation, sequestration and maintenance of foreign chlbroplasts made an organism is termed "chloroplast sequestration" or "kleptoplasty". This phenomenon is known in certain benthic foraminifera, in which such kleptoplasts can be found both intact and functional, but with different retention times depending on foraminiferal species. In the present study, seven species of benthic foraminifera (Haynesina germanica, Elphidium williamsoni, E. selseyense, E. oceanense, E. aff. E. dispirit, Planoglabratella opercularis and Ammonia sp.) were collected from shallow-water benthic habitats and examined with the transmission electron microscope (TEM) for cellular ultrastructure to ascertain attributes of kleptoplasts. Results indicate that all these foraminiferal taxa actively obtain kleptoplasts but organized them differently within their endoplasm. In some species, the kleptoplasts were evenly distributed throughout the endoplasm (e.g., H. germanica, E. oceanense, Ammonia sp.), whereas other species consistently had plastids distributed close to the external cell membrane (e.g., Elphidium williamsoni, E. selseyense, P. opercularis). Chloroplast degradation also seemed to differ between species, as many degraded plastids were found in Ammonia sp. and E. oceanense compared to other investigated species. Digestion ability, along with different feeding and sequestration strategies may explain the differences in retention time between taxa. Additionally, the organization of the sequestered plastids within the endoplasm may also suggest behavioral strategies to expose and/or protect the sequestered plastids to/from light and/or to favor gas and/or nutrient exchange with their surrounding habitats.

Full Text
File Pages Size Access
17 19 MB Access on demand
Author's final draft 53 24 MB Open access
Top of the page

How to cite 

Jauffrais Thierry, Lekieffre Charlotte, Koho Karoliina A., Tsuchiya Masashi, Schweizer Magali, Bernhard Joan M., Meibom Anders, Geslin Emmanuelle (2018). Ultrastructure and distribution of kleptoplasts in benthic foraminifera from shallow-water (photic) habitats. Marine Micropaleontology, 138, 46-62. Publisher's official version : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marmicro.2017.10.003 , Open Access version : https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00457/56889/