|Author(s)||Morrill Carrie1, 2, Ward Ellen M.3, Wagner Amy J.4, Otto-Bliesner Bette L.5, Rosenbloom Nan5|
|Affiliation(s)||1 : Univ Colorado, Cooperat Inst Res Environm Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA.
2 : NOAA, Natl Climat Data Ctr, Boulder, CO USA.
3 : Stanford Univ, Dept Environm Earth Syst Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
4 : Calif State Univ Sacramento, Dept Geol, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA.
5 : Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Climate & Global Dynam Div, Boulder, CO 80307 USA.
|Source||Paleoceanography (0883-8305) (Amer Geophysical Union), 2014-10 , Vol. 29 , N. 10 , P. 930-945|
|WOS© Times Cited||16|
|Keyword(s)||Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation, abrupt climate change, deglaciation, 8, 2 ka event, freshwater forcing, coupled climate model simulation|
The 8.2ka event is a key test case for simulating the coupled climate response to changes in the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). Recent advances in quantifying freshwater fluxes at 8.2ka from the proxy record have improved the realism of the forcing magnitude in model simulations, yet this forcing is still generally applied in an unrealistic geographic manner, across most of the Labrador Sea rather than just along the Labrador coast. Previous simulations with eddy- resolving ocean models have come to conflicting conclusions regarding the ability of such a coastally confined flow to impact the AMOC. These simulations have also not incorporated full atmosphere models nor have they used the new meltwater forcing values for 8.2ka. We use the Community Climate System Model, version 3, with an ocean model resolution only slightly coarser than that used in previous eddy-resolving simulations, to test the sensitivity to freshwater forcing location. When revised freshwater forcing is applied across the Labrador Sea, the AMOC is reduced by similar to 40% and climate anomalies compare well with proxy records of the 8.2ka event in terms of magnitude and duration. When the forcing is added just along the Labrador coast, however, most meltwater joins the subtropical gyre and travels to the subtropics with minor impact to the AMOC (similar to 10% decrease). It is likely that model biases in the placement of the North Atlantic Current remain an important limitation for correctly simulating the 8.2ka event.
Morrill Carrie, Ward Ellen M., Wagner Amy J., Otto-Bliesner Bette L., Rosenbloom Nan (2014). Large sensitivity to freshwater forcing location in 8.2ka simulations. Paleoceanography, 29(10), 930-945. Publisher's official version : https://doi.org/10.1002/2014PA002669 , Open Access version : https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00496/60735/