Alpha and beta diversity patterns of polychaete assemblages across the nodule province of the eastern Clarion-Clipperton Fracture Zone (equatorial Pacific)

Type Article
Date 2020-02
Language English
Author(s) Bonifácio Paulo1, Martinez-Arbizu Pedro2, Menot LenaickORCID1
Affiliation(s) 1 : Ifremer, Centre Bretagne, REM EEP, Laboratoire Environnement Profond, ZI de la Pointe du Diable, CS 10070, F-29280 Plouzané, France
2 : Senckenberg am Meer, DZMB, F-26382 Wilhelmshaven, Germany
Source Biogeosciences (1726-4170) (Copernicus GmbH), 2020-02 , Vol. 17 , N. 4 , P. 865-886
DOI 10.5194/bg-2019-255
WOS© Times Cited 1
Note Special issue Assessing environmental impacts of deep-sea mining – revisiting decade-old benthic disturbances in Pacific nodule areas Editor(s): J. Middelburg, T. Treude, M. Haeckel, A. Purser, P. Arbizu, A. Vanreusel, and D. Jones

In the abyssal Equatorial Pacific Ocean, most of the seafloor of the Clarion-Clipperton Fracture Zone (CCFZ), a 6 million km2 polymetallic nodule province, has been preempted for future mining. In light of the large footprint that mining would leave, and given the diversity and the vulnerability of the abyssal fauna, the International Seabed Authority has implemented a regional management plan that includes the creation of nine areas of particular environmental interest (APEIs) located at the periphery of the CCFZ. The APEIs were defined based on the best – albeit very limited – scientific knowledge for the area. The fauna and habitats in the APEIs are unknown, as are species' ranges and the extent of biodiversity across the CCFZ.

As part of the Joint Programming Initiative Healthy and Productive Seas and Oceans (JPI Oceans) pilot action Ecological aspects of deep-sea mining, the SO239 cruise aimed at improving species inventories, determining species ranges, identifying the drivers of beta diversity patterns and assessing the representativeness of an APEI. Four exploration contract areas and an APEI (APEI#3) were sampled along a gradient of sea-surface primary productivity that spanned a distance of 1440 km in the eastern CCFZ. Between 3 and 8 quantitative box cores (0.25 m2; 0–10 cm) were sampled in each study area, resulting in a large collection of polychaetes that were morphologically and molecularly (COI and 16S genes) analyzed.

A total of 275 polychaete morphotypes were identified. Only one morphotype was shared among all five study areas and 49 % were singletons. The patterns in community structure and composition were mainly attributed to variations in food fluxes at the regional scale and nodule density at the local scale. The four exploration contract areas belong to a mesotrophic province. The distance-decay of similarity among the four areas provides an estimated species turnover of 0.04 species km−1 and an average species range of 25 km. The polychaete assemblage in APEI#3 showed the lowest densities, lowest diversity as well as very low, distant-independent similarity with the other four study areas. Given that APEI#3 is located in an oligotrophic province and separated from the CCFZ by the Clarion Fracture Zone, our results call into question the representativeness and the appropriateness of APEI#3 to meet its purpose of preserving the biodiversity of the CCFZ fauna. Two methods for estimating the total number of polychaete species gave estimates that ranged from 498 to 240 000 species. Both methods are biased by the high frequency of singletons in the dataset, which likely result from under-sampling; our estimates thereby merely reflect our level of uncertainty. The assessment of potential risks and scales of biodiversity loss due to nodule mining thus requires an appropriate inventory of species richness in the CCFZ.

Full Text
File Pages Size Access
Publisher's official version 38 8 MB Open access
Discussion paper 38 2 MB Open access
Top of the page

How to cite 

Bonifácio Paulo, Martinez-Arbizu Pedro, Menot Lenaick (2020). Alpha and beta diversity patterns of polychaete assemblages across the nodule province of the eastern Clarion-Clipperton Fracture Zone (equatorial Pacific). Biogeosciences, 17(4), 865-886. Publisher's official version : , Open Access version :