Interregional comparison of benthic ecosystem functioning: Community bioturbation potential in four regions along the NE Atlantic shelf

Bioturbation is one of the key mediators of biogeochemical processes in benthic habitats that can have a high contribution to seafloor functioning and benthic pelagic coupling in coastal waters. Previous studies on bioturbation were limited to point locations and extrapolations in single regions, but have not accounted for regional differences under changing environmental conditions, though there are indications that species contributions will differ across regions or with biotic and abiotic context. To capture those differences and assess global patterns and commonalities, multi-regional analyses are imperative. Here for the first time, bioturbation potential (BPc), a functional indicator of benthic community bioturbation, was estimated based on macrofauna data from four regions (i.e. German Baltic Sea, German North Sea, Belgian part of the North Sea and the Eastern English Channel). For each region and sediment type we identified key species contributing to BPc. Comparison within and across regions demonstrated regional differences, and both overlap and mismatch between species that are functionally important and those that are dominant in biomass. Knowledge on the functionally important species is crucial when management objectives include the protection of certain ecosystem functions. Available environmental layers were used as predictors to model the spatial distribution of BPc for each area and to explore the underlying drivers of differences. Random forest models were trained using as response variables either i) BPc initially calculated per station; or ii) BPp – the species-specific contribution to BPc – for key species (with subsequent summation of their predicted full-coverage distributions to BPc). Maps of BPc distribution predicted by random forest were compared with those generated using natural neighbour interpolation. Overall, derived BPc values increased towards the German parts of the North and Baltic Seas. The relevance of BPc for ecosystem processes and functions, however, vary with biotic and abiotic settings. Results revealed a strong association of BPc with species diversity and region, but less with sediment grain size. A large range of BPc occurred when species richness was low. This suggests that the provisioning of high bioturbation activity is possible also under low diversity, where it is vulnerable due to reduced resilience. The executed multi-regional analysis allowed identifying regional differences in performance of macrofauna, suggesting the need for region-specific conservation and management strategies.

Keyword(s)

Macrofauna traits, Bioturbation index, Biogeographic comparison, Species distribution modelling, Biodiversity attributes, Ecosystem management

Full Text

FilePagesSizeAccess
Publisher's official version
172 Mo
Supplementary Material S1. Map with sampling stations and sediment type layer, temporal and spatial variability of BPc, lists of top 10 key taxa contributing to total BPc and to total AFDW.
41 Mo
Supplementary Material S2. Species lists with traits scores per region.
-190 Ko
Supplementary Material S3. List of available abiotic predictors, predictor’s importance, partial correlation.
-25 Ko
Supplementary Material S4. Model performance for BPc and key species.
-103 Ko
Supplementary Material S5. PERMANOVA, boxplots for AFDW, abundance and species richness, Functional Redundancy.
6751 Ko
Supplementary data 6.
-334 octets
Author's final draft
471 Mo
How to cite
Gogina Mayya, Zettler Michael L., Vanaverbeke Jan, Dannheim Jennifer, Van Hoey Gert, Desroy Nicolas, Wrede Alexa, Reiss Henning, Degraer Steven, Van Lancker Vera, Foveau Aurelie, Braeckman Ulrike, Fiorentino Dario, Holstein Jan, Birchenough Silvana N.R. (2020). Interregional comparison of benthic ecosystem functioning: Community bioturbation potential in four regions along the NE Atlantic shelf. Ecological Indicators. 110. 105945 (17p.). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105945, https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00593/70489/

Copy this text