Copy this text
Genetic and morphological divergence in the warm-water planktonic foraminifera genus Globigerinoides
The planktonic foraminifera genus Globigerinoides provides a prime example of a species-rich genus in which genetic and morphological divergence are uncorrelated. To shed light on the evolutionary processes that lead to the present-day diversity of Globigerinoides, we investigated the genetic, ecological and morphological divergence of its constituent species. We assembled a global collection of single-cell barcode sequences and show that the genus consists of eight distinct genetic types organized in five extant morphospecies. Based on morphological evidence, we reassign the species Globoturborotalita tenella to Globigerinoides and amend Globigerinoides ruber by formally proposing two new subspecies, G. ruber albus n.subsp. and G. ruber ruber in order to express their subspecies level distinction and to replace the informal G. ruber “white” and G. ruber “pink”, respectively. The genetic types within G. ruber and Globigerinoides elongatus show a combination of endemism and coexistence, with little evidence for ecological differentiation. CT-scanning and ontogeny analysis reveal that the diagnostic differences in adult morphologies could be explained by alterations of the ontogenetic trajectories towards final (reproductive) size. This indicates that heterochrony may have caused the observed decoupling between genetic and morphological diversification within the genus. We find little evidence for environmental forcing of either the genetic or the morphological diversification, which allude to biotic interactions such as symbiosis, as the driver of speciation in Globigerinoides.
Full Text
File | Pages | Size | Access | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Publisher's official version | 30 | 5 Mo | ||
S1 Fig. Light microscopy images of the specimen CA1261 identified as Globigerinoides tenellus and from which sequence match the type IIb of Aurahs et al [26,27]. | - | 5 Mo | ||
S2 Fig. Light microscopy images of the holotype of (C319) and paratypes (C208, C281, C329) of G. ruber albus n.subsp. | - | 8 Mo | ||
S1 Table. Metadata and taxonomy of the Sanger sequences used in the study. | - | 229 Ko | ||
S2 Table. Taxonomic equivalence between the existing taxonomic nomenclatures proposed in the literature and our updated molecular taxonomy. | - | 11 Ko | ||
S3 Table. Volume, Cartesian coordinates and parameters of the Raup’s model measured on individual chambers of the five selected morphological species (Figs 9 and 10). | - | 31 Ko |