Projected decreases in future marine export production: the role of the carbon flux through the upper ocean ecosystem

Type Article
Date 2016
Language English
Author(s) Laufkotter CharlotteORCID1, 6, Vogt MeikeORCID1, Gruber NicolasORCID1, Aumont Olivier7, Bopp Laurent2, Doney Scott C.3, Dunne John P.5, Hauck JudithORCID4, John Jasmin G.5, Lima Ivan D.3, Seferian Roland8, Volker Christoph4
Affiliation(s) 1 : Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Biogeochem & Pollutant Dynam, Environm Phys, Zurich, Switzerland.
2 : CEA UVSQ CNRS, IPSL, LSCE, UMR8212, Gif Sur Yvette, France.
3 : Woods Hole Oceanog Inst, Dept Marine Chem & Geochem, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA.
4 : Helmholtz Ctr Polar & Marine Res, Alfred Wegener Inst, Bremerhaven, Germany.
5 : NOAA, Geophys Fluid Dynam Lab, Princeton, NJ USA.
6 : Princeton Univ, NOAA, Geophys Fluid Dynam Lab, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA.
7 : Ctr IRD Bretagne, Lab Phys Oceans, Plouzane, France.
8 : Meteo France, CNRS, CNRM, 42 Ave Gaspard Coriolis, F-31057 Toulouse, France.
Source Biogeosciences (1726-4170) (Copernicus Gesellschaft Mbh), 2016 , Vol. 13 , N. 13 , P. 4023-4047
DOI 10.5194/bg-13-4023-2016
WOS© Times Cited 81
Abstract

Accurate projections of marine particle export production (EP) are crucial for predicting the response of the marine carbon cycle to climate change, yet models show a wide range in both global EP and their responses to climate change. This is, in part, due to EP being the net result of a series of processes, starting with net primary production (NPP) in the sunlit upper ocean, followed by the formation of particulate organic matter and the subsequent sinking and remineralisation of these particles, with each of these processes responding differently to changes in environmental conditions. Here, we compare future projections in EP over the 21st century, generated by four marine ecosystem models under the high emission scenario Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) 8.5 of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and determine the processes driving these changes. The models simulate small to modest decreases in global EP between -1 and -12 %. Models differ greatly with regard to the drivers causing these changes. Among them, the formation of particles is the most uncertain process with models not agreeing on either magnitude or the direction of change. The removal of the sinking particles by remineralisation is simulated to increase in the low and intermediate latitudes in three models, driven by either warming-induced increases in remineralisation or slower particle sinking, and show insignificant changes in the remaining model. Changes in ecosystem structure, particularly the relative role of diatoms matters as well, as diatoms produce larger and denser particles that sink faster and are partly protected from remineralisation. Also this controlling factor is afflicted with high uncertainties, particularly since the models differ already substantially with regard to both the initial (presentday) distribution of diatoms (between 11-94% in the Southern Ocean) and the diatom contribution to particle formation (0.6-3.8 times higher than their contribution to biomass). As a consequence, changes in diatom concentration are a strong driver for EP changes in some models but of low significance in others. Observational and experimental constraints on ecosystem structure and how the fixed carbon is routed through the ecosystem to produce export production are urgently needed in order to improve current generation ecosystem models and their ability to project future changes.

Full Text
File Pages Size Access
Publisher's official version 25 6 MB Open access
Discussion paper 58 5 MB Open access
Supplement to the discussion paper 2 383 KB Open access
Top of the page

How to cite 

Laufkotter Charlotte, Vogt Meike, Gruber Nicolas, Aumont Olivier, Bopp Laurent, Doney Scott C., Dunne John P., Hauck Judith, John Jasmin G., Lima Ivan D., Seferian Roland, Volker Christoph (2016). Projected decreases in future marine export production: the role of the carbon flux through the upper ocean ecosystem. Biogeosciences, 13(13), 4023-4047. Publisher's official version : https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4023-2016 , Open Access version : https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00600/71205/