Spatial and temporal CO2 exchanges measured by Eddy Covariance over a temperate intertidal flat and their relationships to net ecosystem production
|Author(s)||Polsenaere P1, Lamaud E.2, Lafon V.1, Bonnefond J. -M.2, Bretel P1, Delille B.1, 3, Deborde J.1, Loustau D.2, Abril G.1, 5|
|Affiliation(s)||1 : Univ Bordeaux 1, CNRS UMR5805, Lab Environm & Paleoenvironm OCean EPOC, F-33405 Talence, France.
2 : Ctr Bordeaux Aquitaine, INRA, Lab Ecol Fonct & PHYS Environm EPHYSE, F-33883 Villenave Dornon, France.
3 : Univ Liege, Dept Astrophys Geophys & Oceanog, Unite Oceanog Chim, B-4000 Liege, Belgium.
4 : IRD, Noumea 98848, New Caledonia.
5 : Univ Fed Amazonas, LAPA, Lab Potamol Amazon, IRD, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
|Source||Biogeosciences (1726-4170) (Copernicus Gesellschaft Mbh), 2012 , Vol. 9 , N. 1 , P. 249-268|
|WOS© Times Cited||21|
Measurements of carbon dioxide fluxes were performed over a temperate intertidal mudflat in southwestern France using the micrometeorological Eddy Covariance (EC) technique. EC measurements were carried out in two contrasting sites of the Arcachon flat during four periods and in three different seasons (autumn 2007, summer 2008, autumn 2008 and spring 2009). In addition, satellite images of the tidal flat at low tide were used to link the net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE) with the occupation of the mudflat by primary producers, particularly by Zostera noltii meadows. CO2 fluxes during the four deployments showed important spatial and temporal variations, with the flat rapidly shifting from sink to source with the tide. Absolute CO2 fluxes showed generally small negative (influx) and positive (efflux) values, with larger values up to -13 mu mol m(-2) s(-1) for influxes and 19 mu mol m(-2) s(-1) for effluxes. Low tide during the day was mostly associated with a net uptake of atmospheric CO2. In contrast, during immersion and during low tide at night, CO2 fluxes where positive, negative or close to zero, depending on the season and the site. During the autumn of 2007, at the innermost station with a patchy Zostera noltii bed (cover of 22 +/- 14% in the wind direction of measurements), CO2 influx was -1.7 +/- 1.7 mu mol m(-2) s(-1) at low tide during the day, and the efflux was 2.7 +/- 3.7 mu mol m(-2) s(-1) at low tide during the night. A gross primary production (GPP) of 4.4 +/- 4.1 mu mol m(-2) s(-1) during emersion could be attributed to microphytobenthic communities. During the summer and autumn of 2008, at the central station with a dense eelgrass bed (92 +/- 10%), CO2 uptakes at low tide during the day were -1.5 +/- 1.2 and -0.9 +/- 1.7 mu mol m(-2) s(-1), respectively. Night time effluxes of CO2 were 1.0 +/- 0.9 and 0.2 +/- 1.1 mu mol m(-2) s(-1) in summer and autumn, respectively, resulting in a GPP during emersion of 2.5 +/- 1.5 and 1.1 +/- 2.0 mu mol m(-2) s(-1), respectively, attributed primarily to the seagrass community. At the same station in April 2009, before Zostera noltii started to grow, the CO2 uptake at low tide during the day was the highest (2.7 +/- 2.0 mu mol m(-2) s(-1)). Influxes of CO2 were also observed during immersion at the central station in spring and early autumn and were apparently related to phytoplankton blooms occurring at the mouth of the flat, followed by the advection of CO2-depleted water with the flooding tide. Although winter data as well as water carbon measurements would be necessary to determine a precise CO2 budget for the flat, our results suggest that tidal flat ecosystems are a modest contributor to the CO2 budget of the coastal ocean.