Response of blacktip reef sharks Carcharhinus melanopterus to shark bite mitigation products

Type Article
Date 2020-02
Language English
Author(s) Thiele Madeline1, Mourier Johann2, 3, Papastamatiou Yannis4, Ballesta Laurent5, Chateauminois Eric6, Huveneers Charlie1
Affiliation(s) 1 : Southern Shark Ecology Group, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia
2 : MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, IRD, Sète, France
3 : EPHE, PSL Research University, CRIOBE USR3278 EPHECNRS-UPVD, 66860, Perpignan, France
4 : Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, North Miami, Florida, USA
5 : Andromede Oceanologie, Place Cassan, 34280, Carnon, France
6 : Centre Securite Requin, 25 F avenue des artisans, zone Artisanale de la Pointe des Chateaux, 97436, Saint-Leu, Reunion Island, France
Source Scientific Reports (2045-2322) (Springer Science and Business Media LLC), 2020-02 , Vol. 10 , N. 1 , P. 3563 (12p.)
DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-60062-x
WOS© Times Cited 13

Globally, the frequency of shark bites is rising, resulting in an increasing demand for shark deterrents and measures to lessen the impact of shark bites on humans. Most existing shark protection measures are designed to reduce the probability of a bite, but fabrics that minimise injuries when a shark bite occurs can also be used as mitigation devices. Here, we assessed the ability of the Ocean Guardian Scuba7 and Kevlar material to reduce the likelihood of blacktip reef sharks, Carcharhinus melanopterus, from feeding, and to minimise injuries from shark bites. Sharks were enticed to consume a small piece of local reef fish (bait) placed between the two Scuba7 electrodes with the deterrents randomly being turned on or kept off. In the second experiment, the bait was attached to a small pouch made of either standard neoprene or neoprene with a protective layer of Kevlar around it. The Scuba7 reduced the proportion of baits being taken by 67%, (from 100% during control trials to 33%). Sharks also took more time to take the bait when the device was active (165 ± 20.40 s vs. 38.9 ± 3.35 s), approached at a greater distance (80.98 ± 1.72 cm vs. 38.88 ± 3.20 cm) and made a greater number of approaches per trial (19.38 ± 2.29 vs. 3.62 ± 0.53) than when the Scuba7 was inactive. The sizes of punctures from shark bites were significantly smaller on neoprene with Kevlar compared to standard neoprene (3.64 ± 0.26 mm vs. 5.88 ± 0.29 mm). The number of punctures was also fewer when Kevlar was used (14.92 ± 3.16 vs. 74.1 ± 12.44). Overall, the Ocean Guardian Scuba7 and Kevlar reduced the impact of blacktip reef shark bites. These findings may help consumers make informed decisions when purchasing shark deterring and protective products.

Full Text
File Pages Size Access
Publisher's official version 12 2 MB Open access
Supplementary information. 4 575 KB Open access
Top of the page