The Impact of Turbulence and Turbine Operating Condition on the Wakes of Tidal Turbines

Type Article
Date 2021-03
Language English
Author(s) Ebdon Tim1, Allmark Matthew J.1, O’doherty Daphne M.1, Mason-Jones Allan1, O’doherty Tim1, Germain GregoryORCID2, Gaurier BenoitORCID2
Affiliation(s) 1 : Cardiff University, School of Engineering, The Parade, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, UK
2 : IFREMER, Marine and Structures Laboratory, Centre Manche Mer Du Nord, 150 Quai, Gambetta, 62200, Boulogne-sur-Mer, france
Source Renewable Energy (0960-1481) (Elsevier BV), 2021-03 , Vol. 165 , N. Part 2 , P. 96-116
DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2020.11.065
WOS© Times Cited 22
Keyword(s) Turbine wake characteristics, Turbulence, Tip speed ratio, CFD modelling, Experimental analysis

Before initiating a study on the interaction of multiple wakes, it is imperative that turbine wake hydrodynamics are studied in isolation. In this paper CFD computer simulations of downstream turbine wakes have been run using a scale-resolving hybrid turbulence model known as a detached eddy simulation. To allow validation of the CFD simulations the computer models were supported by flume measurements with a lab scale tidal stream turbine run at three tip-speed ratios and three turbulence conditions, varying both turbulence intensity and length-scale.

From the study it was demonstrated that turbulence intensity has a significant impact on the wake development for both recovery and width. The turbulence length scales of between 0.25 and 1.0 rotor diameter did not have a significant impact on the wake.

The turbine operating condition also had an impact on the resulting wakes. In the near wake, centreline velocity recovery was found to increase with increasing turbine thrust due to flow being diverted towards the turbine nacelle. For a volumetric averaged wake, greater power extraction was found to cause the greatest near-wake deficit. Wake width was found to increase with increasing tip-speed ratio (and therefore turbine thrust).

Full Text
File Pages Size Access
Author's final draft 41 2 MB Open access
47 KB Access on demand
21 4 MB Access on demand
Top of the page