Solid Phase Adsorption Toxin Tracking (SPATT) Technology for the Monitoring of Aquatic Toxins: A Review

Type Article
Date 2018-04
Language English
Author(s) Roue MelanieORCID1, Darius Helene Taiana2, Chinain Mireille2
Affiliation(s) 1 : IRD, UMR EIO 241, POB 53267, F-98716 Tahiti, French Polynesi, France.
2 : ILM, UMR EIO 241, Lab Tox Microalgae, POB 30, F-98713 Tahiti, French Polynesi, France.
Source Toxins (2072-6651) (Mdpi), 2018-04 , Vol. 10 , N. 4 , P. 167 (28p.)
DOI 10.3390/toxins10040167
WOS© Times Cited 14
Note This article belongs to the Special Issue Public Health Outreach to Prevention of Aquatic Toxin Exposure
Keyword(s) SPATT technology, passive monitoring, risk assessment, harmful algal blooms, aquatic toxins, microalgae, cyanobacteria
Abstract

The Solid Phase Adsorption Toxin Tracking (SPATT) technology, first introduced in 2004, uses porous synthetic resins capable of passively adsorbing toxins produced by harmful microalgae or cyanobacteria and dissolved in the water. This method allows for the detection of toxic compounds directly in the water column and offers numerous advantages over current monitoring techniques (e.g., shellfish or fish testing and microalgae/cyanobacteria cell detection), despite some limitations. Numerous laboratory and field studies, testing different adsorbent substrates of which Diaion((R)) HP20 resin appears to be the most versatile substrate, have been carried out worldwide to assess the applicability of these passive monitoring devices to the detection of toxins produced by a variety of marine and freshwater microorganisms. SPATT technology has been shown to provide reliable, sensitive and time-integrated sampling of various aquatic toxins, and also has the potential to provide an early warning system for both the occurrence of toxic microalgae or cyanobacteria and bioaccumulation of toxins in foodstuffs. This review describes the wide range of lipophilic and hydrophilic toxins associated with toxin-producing harmful algal blooms (HABs) that are successfully detected by SPATT devices. Implications in terms of monitoring of emerging toxic risks and reinforcement of current risk assessment programs are also discussed.

Full Text
File Pages Size Access
Publisher's official version 28 701 KB Open access
Top of the page