Spatial management can significantly reduce dFAD beachings in Indian and Atlantic Ocean tropical tuna purse seine fisheries

Type Article
Date 2021-02
Language English
Author(s) Imzilen Taha1, 2, 3, Lett Christophe1, 2, Chassot Emmanuel4, 5, Kaplan David1, 2
Affiliation(s) 1 : Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Avenue Jean Monnet, CS30171, 34203 Sète cedex, France
2 : MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, Sète, France
3 : Sorbonne Université, Collège Doctoral, 75005 Paris, France
4 : IRD, PO BOX 570, Victoria, Seychelles
5 : Seychelles Fishing Authority, PO BOX 449, Victoria, Seychelles
Source Biological Conservation (00063207) (Elsevier BV), 2021-02 , Vol. 254 , P. 108939 (9p.)
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108939
Keyword(s) Marine pollution, Fishing debris, Coral reefs, Fish aggregating device (FAD), Ocean currents

Debris from fisheries pose significant threats to coastal marine ecosystems worldwide. Tropical tuna purse seine fisheries contribute to this problem via the construction and deployment of thousands of human-made drifting fish aggregating devices (dFADs) annually, many of which end up beaching in coastal areas. Here, we analyzed approximately 40,000 dFAD trajectories in the Indian Ocean and 12,000 dFAD trajectories in the Atlantic Ocean deployed over the decade 2008–2017 to identify where and when beachings occur. We find that there is tremendous promise for reducing beaching events by prohibiting deployments in areas most likely to lead to a beaching. For example, our results indicate that 21% to 40% (depending on effort redistribution after closure) of beachings can be prevented if deployments are prohibited in areas in the south of 8°S latitude, the Somali zone in winter, and the western Maldives in summer for the Indian Ocean, and in an elongated strip of areas adjacent to the western African coast for the Atlantic Ocean. In both oceans, the riskiest areas for beaching are not coincident with areas of high dFAD deployment activity, suggesting that these closures could be implemented with relatively minimal impact to fisheries. Furthermore, the existence of clear hotspots for beaching likelihood and the high rates of putative recovery of dFAD buoys by small-scale fishers in some areas suggests that early warning systems and dFAD recovery programs may be effective in areas that cannot be protected via closures if appropriate incentives can be provided to local partners for participating in these programs.


Full Text
File Pages Size Access
9 2 MB Access on demand
26 4 MB Access on demand
Author's final draft 33 2 MB Open access
Top of the page