The impact of academic information supply and familiarity on preferences for ecosystem services

Type Article
Date 2021-05
Language English
Author(s) Sy Mariam Maki1, Rey-Valette Hélène2, Figuières Charles3, Simier Monique4, de Wit Rutger1
Affiliation(s) 1 : MARBEC, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
2 : Centre d'Economie de I'Environnement – Montpellier (CEE – M), Université de Montpellier, CNRS, INRAE, Institut Agro, Avenue Raymond Dugrand, 34000 Montpellier, France
3 : Aix-Marseille Université, UMR AMSE (CNRS, EHESS, Ecole centrale de Marseille, Université d'Aix-Marseille), 5 boulevard Maurice Bourdet, CS 50498, 13205 Marseille Cedex 01, France
4 : MARBEC, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, Avenue Jean Monnet, 34203 Sète, France
Source Ecological Economics (0921-8009) (Elsevier BV), 2021-05 , Vol. 183 , P. 106959 (15p.)
DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106959
WOS© Times Cited 9
Keyword(s) Preference elicitation, Coastal lagoons, Citizens' workshop, Paternalism, Cultural ecosystem services (CES), Veil of ignorance

Preferences elicitation can be a challenging exercise for citizens participating in assessment surveys. It is even more challenging when it comes to complex and unfamiliar ecosystems and the threatened ecosystem services they provide. Making people aware of the characteristics of the ecosystem services being valued is determinant for the assessment process. We investigated the impact of familiarity and academic information supply on people's preferences for twenty selected ecosystem services of French Mediterranean coastal lagoons. The results show that regardless of familiarity and information supply, there is a strong consensus about the highest importance of regulation and maintenance ecosystem services as well as environmental education and research opportunity ecosystem services. By contrast, nine of the cultural ecosystem services, together with two provisioning ecosystem services showed heterogeneous preferences among the different citizen groups. Using a combination of descriptive and inferential statistics these eleven ecosystem services split up into three clusters characterized as (i) contemplative leisure, (ii) heritage, and (iii) consumptive activities. Familiarity and academic information supply had a strong impact on the preferences for these three clusters of ecosystem services.

Full Text
File Pages Size Access
15 1 MB Access on demand
Author's final draft 39 1 MB Open access
Top of the page