Protecting the global ocean for biodiversity, food and climate
Type | Article | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date | 2021-04 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Language | English | ||||||||||||||||||||
Author(s) | Sala Enric![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
Affiliation(s) | 1 : Pristine Seas, National Geographic Society, Washington, DC, USA 2 : Environmental Market Solutions Lab, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA 3 : Department of Watershed Sciences and Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA 4 : IFREMER, Unité Halieutique de Manche et Mer du Nord, Boulogne-sur-Mer, France 5 : Changing Ocean Research Unit, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 6 : Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA 7 : Hawai‘i Institute of Marine Biology, Kāne‘ohe, HI, USA 8 : Evolutionary Biology and Ecology Laboratory, Albert Ludwigs University, Freiburg, Germany 9 : National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS), University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA 10 : Quantitative Aquatics, Los Baños, The Philippines 11 : MARBEC, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France 12 : The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA, USA 13 : Marine Conservation Institute, Seattle, WA, USA 14 : Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science (CBCS), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia 15 : Dynamic Planet, Washington, DC, USA 16 : Ocean Frontiers Institute, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada 17 : Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA |
||||||||||||||||||||
Source | Nature (0028-0836) (Springer Science and Business Media LLC), 2021-04 , Vol. 592 , N. 7854 , P. 397-402 | ||||||||||||||||||||
DOI | 10.1038/s41586-021-03371-z | ||||||||||||||||||||
WOS© Times Cited | 184 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract | The ocean contains unique biodiversity, provides valuable food resources and is a major sink for anthropogenic carbon. Marine protected areas (MPAs) are an effective tool for restoring ocean biodiversity and ecosystem services1,2, but at present only 2.7% of the ocean is highly protected3. This low level of ocean protection is due largely to conflicts with fisheries and other extractive uses. To address this issue, here we developed a conservation planning framework to prioritize highly protected MPAs in places that would result in multiple benefits today and in the future. We find that a substantial increase in ocean protection could have triple benefits, by protecting biodiversity, boosting the yield of fisheries and securing marine carbon stocks that are at risk from human activities. Our results show that most coastal nations contain priority areas that can contribute substantially to achieving these three objectives of biodiversity protection, food provision and carbon storage. A globally coordinated effort could be nearly twice as efficient as uncoordinated, national-level conservation planning. Our flexible prioritization framework could help to inform both national marine spatial plans4 and global targets for marine conservation, food security and climate action. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Full Text |
|