Contributions of altimetry and Argo to non‐closure of the global mean sea level budget since 2016
|Author(s)||Barnoud Anne1, Pfeffer Julia1, Guérou Adrien2, Frery Marie‐laure2, Siméon Mathilde2, Cazenave Anny1, 3, Chen Jianli4, Llovel William5, Thierry Virginie6, Legeais Jean Francois2, Ablain Michaël1|
|Affiliation(s)||1 : Magellium, 1 rue Ariane31520, Ramonville‐Saint‐Agne ,France
2 : CLS ,11 rue Hermes31520, Ramonville Saint Agne ,France
3 : LEGOS ,18 avenue Edouard Belin31401, Toulouse cedex 9 ,France
4 : Center for Space Research, University of Texas Austin TX ,USA
5 : Univ Brest ,CNRS Ifremer, IRD LOPS, F‐29280 Plouzané, France
6 : Univ Brest, Ifremer CNRS IRD LOPS, F‐29280 Plouzané, France
|Source||Geophysical Research Letters (0094-8276) (American Geophysical Union (AGU)), 2021-07 , Vol. 48 , N. 14 , P. e2021GL092824 (10p.)|
|WOS© Times Cited||23|
|Keyword(s)||Argo, GRACE, GRACE-FO, satellite altimetry, sea level, sea level budget|
Over 1993-2016, studies have shown that the observed global mean sea level (GMSL) budget is closed within the current data uncertainties. However, non-closure of the budget was recently reported when using Jason-3, Argo and GRACE/GRACE Follow-On data after 2016. This non-closure may result from errors in the datasets used to estimate the GMSL and its components. Here, we investigate possible sources of errors affecting Jason-3 and Argo data. Comparisons of Jason-3 GMSL trends with other altimetry missions show good agreement within 0.4 mm/yr over 2016-present. Besides, the wet tropospheric correction uncertainty from the Jason-3 radiometer contributes to up to 0.2 mm/yr. Therefore, altimetry alone cannot explain the misfit in the GMSL budget observed after 2016. Argo-based salinity products display strong discrepancies since 2016, attributed to instrumental problems and data editing issues. Re-assessment of the sea level budget with the thermosteric component provides about 40 % improvement in the budget closure.
Plain Language Summary
Sea level rise, due to the addition of meltwater from glaciers and ice-sheets in the oceans and to the thermal expansion of seawater, is commonly used as an indicator for climate change. The sea level budget provides information on temporal changes in one or more components of the budget, on process understanding, on missing contributions and allows cross validation of the observing systems involved in the sea level budget (satellite altimetry, Argo oceanic float and GRACE/GRACE Follow-On satellite gravimetry). The sea level budget was closed until 2015-2016, i.e. the observed global mean sea level agrees well with the sum of components. However, since 2016, the budget is not closed anymore. In this study, we show that errors in Argo salinity measurements are responsible for about 40 % of the budget error while the altimetry data cannot explain the remaining error. Other sources of errors should be further investigated to fully understand the error in the budget after 2016, in particular satellite GRACE/GRACE Follow-On gravity measurements or missing physical contributions.