Processes controlling aggregate formation and distribution during the Arctic phytoplankton spring bloom in Baffin Bay

Type Article
Date 2021-10
Language English
Author(s) Toullec Jordan1, Moriceau Brivaela1, Vincent Dorothée2, Guidi Lionel3, Lafond Augustin4, Babin Marcel5, 6
Affiliation(s) 1 : Univ Brest, CNRS, IRD, Ifremer, Laboratoire des sciences de l'environnement marin (LEMAR), Plouzané, France
2 : Office Français de la Biodiversité (OFB), Direction Surveillance, Evaluation Données (DSUED), Service Évaluation Connaissances et Usages du Milieu Marin (ECUMM), Brest, France
3 : Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, CNRS, Laboratoire d’Océanographie de Villefranche (LOV) UMR7093, Observatoire Océanologique, Villefranche-sur-Mer, France
4 : Aix-Marseille University, Université de Toulon, CNRS, IRD, MIO, UM 110, Marseille, France
5 : Takuvik Joint International Laboratory, Laval University (Québec City, Quebec, Canada), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris, France
6 : Département de biologie et Québec-Océan, Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec, Canada
Source Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene (2325-1026) (University of California Press), 2021-10 , Vol. 9 , N. 1 , P. 19p.
DOI 10.1525/elementa.2021.00001
Keyword(s) Arctic phytoplankton spring bloom, Baffin Bay, Sea ice, Diatoms, Phaeocystis spp., Copepods, Marine snow, Aggregates, UVP5
Abstract

In the last decades, the Arctic Ocean has been affected by climate change, leading to alterations in the sea ice cover that influence the phytoplankton spring bloom, its associated food web, and therefore carbon sequestration. During the Green Edge 2016 expedition in the central Baffin Bay, the phytoplankton spring bloom and its development around the ice edge was followed along 7 transects from open water to the ice-pack interior. Here, we studied some of the processes driving phytoplankton aggregation, using aggregate and copepod distribution profiles obtained with an underwater vision profiler deployed at several stations along the transects. Our results revealed a sequential pattern during sea ice retreat in phytoplankton production and in aggregate production and distribution. First, under sea ice, phytoplankton started to grow, but aggregates were not formed. Second, after sea ice melting, phytoplankton (diatoms and Phaeocystis spp. as the dominant groups) benefited from the light availability and stratified environment to bloom, and aggregation began coincident with nutrient depletion at the surface. Third, maxima of phytoplankton aggregates deepened in the water column and phytoplankton cells at the surface began to degrade. At most stations, silicate limitation began first, triggering aggregation of the phytoplankton cells; nitrate limitation came later. Copepods followed aggregates at the end of the phytoplankton bloom, possibly because aggregates provided higher quality food than senescing phytoplankton cells at the surface. These observations suggest that aggregation is involved in 2 export pathways constituting the biological pump: the gravitational pathway through the sinking of aggregates and fecal pellets and the migration pathway when zooplankton follow aggregates during food foraging.

Full Text
File Pages Size Access
Publisher's official version 19 2 MB Open access
Supplemental material. Table S1. List of parameters per sampling stations. Table S2. Pigment concentrations in the EML. 67 KB Open access
Top of the page