The CISE-LOCEAN seawater isotopic database (1998–2021)

Type Article
Date 2022-06
Language English
Author(s) Reverdin Gilles1, Waelbroeck Claire1, Pierre Catherine1, Akhoudas Camille1, Aloisi Giovanni2, Benetti Marion1, Bourlès BernardORCID3, Danielsen Magnus4, Demange Jérôme1, Diverrès Denis3, Gascard Jean-Claude1, Houssais Marie-Noëlle1, Le Goff Hervé1, Lherminier PascaleORCID5, Lo Monaco Claire1, Mercier HerleORCID16, Metzl Nicolas1, Morisset Simon6, Naamar Aïcha1, Reynaud ThierryORCID5, Sallée Jean-Baptiste1, Thierry VirginieORCID5, Hartman Susan E.7, Mawji Edward M.7, Olafsdottir SolveigORCID4, Kanzow TorstenORCID8, Velo Anton9, Voelker AntjeORCID10, 11, Yashayaev Igor12, Haumann Alexander13, Leng Melanie J.14, Arrowsmith Carol14, Meredith Michael15
Affiliation(s) 1 : Sorbonne University, LOCEAN - IPSL, CNRS–IRD–MNHN, Paris, France
2 : Université de Paris, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, CNRS, 75005 Paris, France
3 : UMS IMAGO, IRD, Plouzané, France
4 : Marine and Fresh Water Institute, Iceland
5 : University of Brest, LOPS, IUEM, UBO–CNRS–IRD–Ifremer, Plouzané, France
6 : Amundsen Science, Québec, Canada
7 : National Oceanogaphy Center, Southampton, UK
8 : MARUM/Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
9 : Intituto de Investigaciones Marinas de Vigo, CSIC, Vigo, Spain
10 : Istituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Lisbon, Portugal
11 : Centro de Ciencias do Mar, Faro, Portugal
12 : Bedford Institute of Oceanogaphy, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia Canada
13 : Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Program, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
14 : British Geological Survey, Nottingham, UK
15 : British Geological Survey, Nottingham, UK 15British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK
16 : University of Brest, LOPS, IUEM, UBO–CNRS–IRD–Ifremer, Plouzané, France
Source Earth System Science Data (1866-3508) (Copernicus GmbH), 2022-06 , Vol. 14 , N. 6 , P. 2721-2735
DOI 10.5194/essd-14-2721-2022
WOS© Times Cited 6
Abstract

The characteristics of the CISE-LOCEAN sea water isotope data set (δ18O, δ2H, later designed as δD) are presented. This data set covers the time period from 1998 to 2021 and currently includes close to 8000 data entries, all with δ18O, three quarters of them also with δD, associated with a time and space stamp and usually a salinity measurement. Until 2010, samples were analysed by isotopic ratio mass spectrometry, and since then mostly by cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS). Instrumental uncertainty on individual data in this dataset is usually with a standard deviation as low as 0.03 / 0.15 ‰ for δ18O and δD. An additional uncertainty is related to uncertain isotopic composition of the in-house standards that are used to convert daily data into the VSMOW scale. Different comparisons suggest that since 2010 the latter have remained within at most 0.03 / 0.20 ‰ for δ18O and δD. Therefore, combining the two suggests a standard deviation of at most 0.05 / 0.25 ‰ for δ18O / δD.

Finally, for some samples, we find that there has been evaporation during collection and storage, requiring adjustment of the isotopic data produced by CRDS, based on d-excess. This adds an uncertainty on the adjusted data of roughly 0.05 / 0.10 ‰ on δ18O and δD. This issue of conservation of samples is certainly a strong source of quality loss for parts of the database, and ‘small’ effects may have remained undetected.

The internal consistency of the database can be tested for subsets of the dataset, when time series can be obtained (such as in the southern Indian Ocean or North Atlantic subpolar gyre). These comparisons suggest that the overall uncertainty of the spatially (for a cruise) or temporally (over a year) averaged data is on the order of or less than 0.03 / 0.15 ‰ for δ18O / δD. On the other hand, 17 comparisons with duplicate sea water data analysed in other laboratories or with other data sets in deep regions suggest a larger scatter. When averaging the 17 comparisons done for δ18O, we find a difference close to the adjustment applied at LOCEAN to convert salty water data from the activity to the concentration scale. Such a difference is expected, but the scatter found suggests that care is needed when merging datasets from different laboratories. Examples of time series in the surface North Atlantic subpolar gyre illustrate the temporal changes in water isotope composition that can be detected with a carefully validated dataset.

Full Text
File Pages Size Access
Preprint 24 530 KB Open access
Publisher's official version 15 1 MB Open access
Top of the page

How to cite 

Reverdin Gilles, Waelbroeck Claire, Pierre Catherine, Akhoudas Camille, Aloisi Giovanni, Benetti Marion, Bourlès Bernard, Danielsen Magnus, Demange Jérôme, Diverrès Denis, Gascard Jean-Claude, Houssais Marie-Noëlle, Le Goff Hervé, Lherminier Pascale, Lo Monaco Claire, Mercier Herle, Metzl Nicolas, Morisset Simon, Naamar Aïcha, Reynaud Thierry, Sallée Jean-Baptiste, Thierry Virginie, Hartman Susan E., Mawji Edward M., Olafsdottir Solveig, Kanzow Torsten, Velo Anton, Voelker Antje, Yashayaev Igor, Haumann Alexander, Leng Melanie J., Arrowsmith Carol, Meredith Michael (2022). The CISE-LOCEAN seawater isotopic database (1998–2021). Earth System Science Data, 14(6), 2721-2735. Publisher's official version : https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2721-2022 , Open Access version : https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00750/86197/