Argo salinity: bias and uncertainty evaluation

Type Article
Date 2023-01
Language English
Author(s) Wong Annie P. S.ORCID1, Gilson JohnORCID2, Cabanes CecileORCID3, 4
Affiliation(s) 1 : School of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
2 : Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA, USA
3 : Laboratoire d'Océanographie Physique et Spatiale (LOPS), University of Brest, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, IUEM, Brest, France
4 : UAR 3113, University of Brest, CNRS, IRD, IUEM, Brest, France
Source Earth System Science Data (1866-3508) (Copernicus GmbH), 2023-01 , Vol. 15 , N. 1 , P. 383-393
DOI 10.5194/essd-15-383-2023
WOS© Times Cited 7
Abstract

Argo salinity is a key set of in situ ocean measurements for many scientific applications. However, use of the raw, unadjusted salinity data should be done with caution as they may contain bias from various instrument problems, most significant being from sensor calibration drift in the conductivity cells. For example, inclusion of biased but unadjusted Argo salinity has been shown to lead to spurious results in the global sea level estimates. Argo delayed-mode salinity data are data that have been evaluated and, if needed, adjusted for sensor drift. These delayed-mode data represent an improvement over the raw data because of the reduced bias, the detailed quality control flags, and the provision of uncertainty estimates. Such improvement may help researchers in scientific applications that are sensitive to salinity errors. Both the raw data and the delayed-mode data can be accessed via https://doi.org/10.17882/42182 (Argo, 2022). In this paper, we first describe the Argo delayed-mode process. The bias in the raw salinity data is then analyzed by using the adjustments that have been applied in delayed mode. There was an increase in salty bias in the raw Argo data beginning around 2015 and peaking during 2017–2018. This salty bias is expected to decrease in the coming years as the underlying manufacturer problem has likely been resolved. The best ways to use Argo data to ensure that the instrument bias is filtered out are then described. Finally, a validation of the Argo delayed-mode salinity dataset is carried out to quantify residual errors and regional variations in uncertainty. These results reinforce the need for continual re-evaluation of this global dataset.

Full Text
File Pages Size Access
Publisher's official version 11 3 MB Open access
Preprint 21 1 MB Open access
Top of the page