Diversity–stability relationships across organism groups and ecosystem types become decoupled across spatial scales

Type Article
Date 2023-09
Language English
Author(s) Wisnoski Nathan I.ORCID1, 2, 3, Andrade RileyORCID4, 5, Castorani Max C. N.ORCID6, Catano Christopher P.ORCID7, Compagnoni AldoORCID8, 9, Lamy ThomasORCID10, 11, Lany Nina K.12, Marazzi Luca13, 14, Record SydneORCID15, 16, Smith Annie C.17, 18, 19, 20, Swan Christopher M.ORCID21, Tonkin Jonathan D.ORCID22, 23, 24, Voelker Nicole M.ORCID21, Zarnetske Phoebe L.18, 19, Sokol Eric R.ORCID25, 26
Affiliation(s) 1 : Department of Biological Sciences Mississippi State University Mississippi State MS,USA
2 : Wyoming Geographic Information Science Center University of Wyoming Laramie WY ,USA
3 : Department of Biology Indiana University Bloomington IN, USA
4 : Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL, USA
5 : Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation University of Florida Gainesville FL,USA
6 : Department of Environmental Sciences University of Virginia Charlottesville VA, USA
7 : Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University East Lansing MI, USA
8 : Martin Luther University Halle‐Wittenberg, Am Kirchtor 1 Halle (Saale),Germany
9 : German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Puschstrasse 4 Leipzig ,Germany
10 : Marine Science Institute University of California Santa Barbara CA ,USA
11 : MARBEC University of Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD Montpellier, France
12 : Northern Research Station, Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Durham NH, USA
13 : Institute of Environment Florida International University Miami FL ,USA
14 : Thames21 London,UK
15 : Department of Biology Bryn Mawr College Bryn Mawr PA ,USA
16 : Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Conservation Biology University of Maine Orono ME ,USA
17 : Department of Forestry Michigan State University East Lansing MI ,USA
18 : Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior Program Michigan State University East Lansing MI,USA
19 : Department of Integrative Biology Michigan State University East Lansing MI,USA
20 : Washington State Department of Natural Resources Olympia WA,USA
21 : Department of Geography & Environmental Systems University of Maryland, Baltimore County Baltimore MD, USA
22 : School of Biological Sciences University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800 Christchurch ,New Zealand
23 : Te Pūnaha Matatini Centre of Research Excellence University of Canterbury Christchurch ,New Zealand
24 : Bioprotection Aotearoa Centre of Research Excellence University of Canterbury Christchurch ,New Zealand
25 : National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON), Battelle Boulder CO ,USA
26 : Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research (INSTAAR) University of Colorado Boulder CO ,USA
Source Ecology (0012-9658) (Wiley), 2023-09 , Vol. 104 , N. 9 , P. e4136 (17p.)
DOI 10.1002/ecy.4136
WOS© Times Cited 2
Keyword(s) community variability, diversity-stability relationship, metacommunity, spatial insurance hypothesis, stability
Abstract

The relationship between biodiversity and stability, or its inverse, temporal variability, is multidimensional and complex. Temporal variability in aggregate properties, like total biomass or abundance, is typically lower in communities with higher species diversity (i.e., the diversity–stability relationship or DSR). At broader spatial extents, regional-scale aggregate variability is also lower with higher regional diversity (in plant systems) and with lower spatial synchrony. However, focusing exclusively on aggregate properties of communities may overlook potentially destabilizing compositional shifts. It is not yet clear how diversity is related to different components of variability across spatial scales, nor whether regional DSRs emerge across a broad range of organisms and ecosystem types. To test these questions, we compiled a large collection of long-term metacommunity data spanning a wide range of taxonomic groups (e.g., birds, fish, plants, invertebrates) and ecosystem types (e.g., deserts, forests, oceans). We applied a newly developed quantitative framework for jointly analyzing aggregate and compositional variability across scales. We quantified DSRs for composition and aggregate variability in local communities and metacommunities. At the local scale, more diverse communities were less variable, but this effect was stronger for aggregate than compositional properties. We found no stabilizing effect of γ-diversity on metacommunity variability, but β-diversity played a strong role in reducing compositional spatial synchrony, which reduced regional variability. Spatial synchrony differed among taxa, suggesting differences in stabilization by spatial processes. However, metacommunity variability was more strongly driven by local variability than by spatial synchrony. Across a broader range of taxa, our results suggest that high γ-diversity does not consistently stabilize aggregate properties at regional scales without sufficient spatial β-diversity to reduce spatial synchrony.

Full Text
File Pages Size Access
Publisher's official version 44 8 MB Open access
Appendix S1 41 17 MB Open access
Appendix S2 10 1 MB Open access
Top of the page

How to cite 

Wisnoski Nathan I., Andrade Riley, Castorani Max C. N., Catano Christopher P., Compagnoni Aldo, Lamy Thomas, Lany Nina K., Marazzi Luca, Record Sydne, Smith Annie C., Swan Christopher M., Tonkin Jonathan D., Voelker Nicole M., Zarnetske Phoebe L., Sokol Eric R. (2023). Diversity–stability relationships across organism groups and ecosystem types become decoupled across spatial scales. Ecology, 104(9), e4136 (17p.). Publisher's official version : https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.4136 , Open Access version : https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00846/95769/