Genetic erosion reduces biomass temporal stability in wild fish populations

Type Article
Date 2023-07
Language English
Author(s) Prunier Jérôme G.ORCID1, Chevalier Mathieu2, Raffard Allan1, Loot Géraldine3, Poulet Nicolas4, Blanchet SimonORCID1, 3
Affiliation(s) 1 : Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Paul Sabatier (UPS); Station d’Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale, UAR 2029, F-09200, Moulis, France
2 : Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Biophore, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
3 : CNRS, UPS, École Nationale de Formation Agronomique (ENFA), UMR 5174 EDB (Laboratoire Évolution & Diversité Biologique), 118 route de Narbonne, F-31062, Toulouse, cedex, 4, France
4 : Pôle écohydraulique AFB-IMT, allée du Pr Camille Soula, 31400, Toulouse, France
Source Nature Communications (2041-1723) (Springer Science and Business Media LLC), 2023-07 , Vol. 14 , N. 1 , P. 4362 (12p.)
DOI 10.1038/s41467-023-40104-4
Abstract

Genetic diversity sustains species adaptation. However, it may also support key ecosystems functions and services, for example biomass production, that can be altered by the worldwide loss of genetic diversity. Despite extensive experimental evidence, there have been few attempts to empirically test whether genetic diversity actually promotes biomass and biomass stability in wild populations. Here, using long-term demographic wild fish data from two large river basins in southwestern France, we demonstrate through causal modeling analyses that populations with high genetic diversity do not reach higher biomasses than populations with low genetic diversity. Nonetheless, populations with high genetic diversity have much more stable biomasses over recent decades than populations having suffered from genetic erosion, which has implications for the provision of ecosystem services and the risk of population extinction. Our results strengthen the importance of adopting prominent environmental policies to conserve this important biodiversity facet.

Full Text
File Pages Size Access
Publisher's official version 12 1 MB Open access
Supplementary Information 16 1 MB Open access
Peer Review File 8 239 KB Open access
Description of Additional Supplementary Files 1 109 KB Open access
Supplementary Data 1 24 KB Open access
Reporting Summary 4 1 MB Open access
Source Data 1 MB Open access
Top of the page