Critique of Proposals 258–260 to eliminate contradiction between Articles 11.7 and 11.8 and to equate non-fossil with fossil names of dinophytes for purposes of priority, by Elbrächter & al. (2023), and ensuing recommendations

Head, Martin j.; Fensome, Robert a.; Mertens, Kenneth; Herendeen, Patrick s.

doi:10.1002/tax.13128

Critique of Proposals 258–260 to eliminate contradiction between Articles 11.7 and 11.8 and to equate non-fossil with fossil names of dinophytes for purposes of priority, by Elbrächter & al. (2023), and ensuing recommendations

Full Text

File	Pages	Size	Access
Publisher's official version	3	63 Ko		Download

How to cite

Head Martin J., Fensome Robert A., Mertens Kenneth, Herendeen Patrick S. (2024). Critique of Proposals 258–260 to eliminate contradiction between Articles 11.7 and 11.8 and to equate non-fossil with fossil names of dinophytes for purposes of priority, by Elbrächter & al. (2023), and ensuing recommendations. Taxon. 73 (1). 405-407. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13128, https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00875/98721/

Copy this text