Critique of Proposals 258–260 to eliminate contradiction between Articles 11.7 and 11.8 and to equate non-fossil with fossil names of dinophytes for purposes of priority, by Elbrächter & al. (2023), and ensuing recommendations

Type Article
Date 2024-02-01
Language English
Author(s) Head Martin J.1, Fensome Robert A.2, Mertens KennethORCID3, Herendeen Patrick S.4
Affiliation(s) 1 : Department of Earth Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario L2S 3A1, Canada
2 : Natural Resources Canada, Geological Survey of Canada (Atlantic), P.O. Box 1006, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B2Y 4A2, Canada
3 : Ifremer, LITTORAL, 29900 Concarneau, France
4 : Chicago Botanic Garden, 1000 Lake Cook Road, Glencoe, Illinois 60022, U.S.A.
Source Taxon (1996-8175) (International Association for Plant Taxonomy), 2024-02-01 , Vol. 73 , N. 1 , P. 405-407
DOI 10.1002/tax.13128
Full Text
File Pages Size Access
Publisher's official version 3 63 KB Open access
Top of the page

How to cite 

Head Martin J., Fensome Robert A., Mertens Kenneth, Herendeen Patrick S. (2024). Critique of Proposals 258–260 to eliminate contradiction between Articles 11.7 and 11.8 and to equate non-fossil with fossil names of dinophytes for purposes of priority, by Elbrächter & al. (2023), and ensuing recommendations. Taxon, 73(1), 405-407. Publisher's official version : https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13128 , Open Access version : https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00875/98721/