Atmospheric CO2 exchanges measured by eddy covariance over a temperate salt marsh and influence of environmental controlling factors

Type Article
Date 2024-02
Language English
Author(s) Mayen Jeremy1, 2, Polsenaere PierreORCID1, Lamaud Éric3, Arnaud MarieORCID1, 4, Kostyrka PierreORCID1, Bonnefond Jean-Marc3, Geairon Philippe1, Gernigon Julien6, Chassagne RomainORCID7, Lacoue-Labarthe Thomas8, Regaudie De Gioux AuroreORCID5, Souchu Philippe2
Affiliation(s) 1 : IFREMER, Littoral, Laboratoire Environnement Ressources des Pertuis Charentais (LER/PC), BP 133, 17390 La Tremblade, France
2 : IFREMER, Littoral, Laboratoire Environnement Ressources Morbihan-Pays de Loire (LER/MPL), BP 21105, 44311 Nantes, France
3 : INRAE, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, ISPA, 33140 Villenave d’Ornon, France
4 : Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences Paris (iEES-Paris), Sorbonne University, 75005 Paris, France
5 : IFREMER, Dyneco, Pelagos, ZI de la Pointe du Diable – CS 10070, 29280 Plouzané, France
6 : LPO, Réserve Naturelle de Lilleau des Niges, 17880 Les Portes en Ré, France
7 : BRGM, 3 avenue Claude-Guillemin, BP 36009, 45060 Orléans, CEDEX 02, Orléans, France
8 : Littoral Environnement et Sociétés (LIENSs), UMR 7276, CNRS, La Rochelle Université, 2 Rue Olympe de Gouge, 17000 La Rochelle, France
Source Biogeosciences (1726-4170) (Copernicus GmbH), 2024-02 , Vol. 21 , N. 4 , P. 993-1016
DOI 10.5194/bg-21-993-2024
Abstract

Within the coastal zone, salt marshes are atmospheric CO2 sinks and represent an essential component of biological carbon (C) stored on earth due to a strong primary production. Significant amounts of C are processed within these tidal systems which requires a better understanding of the temporal CO2 flux dynamics, the metabolic processes involved and the controlling factors. Within a temperate salt marsh (French Atlantic coast), continuous CO2 fluxes measurements were performed by the atmospheric eddy covariance technique to assess the net ecosystem exchange (NEE) at diurnal, tidal and seasonal scales as well as the associated relevant biophysical drivers. To study marsh metabolic processes, measured NEE was partitioned into gross primary production (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (Reco) during marsh emersion allowing to estimate NEE at the marsh–atmosphere interface (NEEmarsh = GPP − Reco). During the year 2020, the net C balance from measured NEE was −483 g C m−2 yr−1 while GPP and Reco absorbed and emitted 1019 and 533 g C m−2 yr−1, respectively. The highest CO2 uptake was recorded in spring during the growing season for halophyte plants in relationships with favourable environmental conditions for photosynthesis, whereas in summer, higher temperatures and lower humidity rates increased ecosystem respiration. At the diurnal scale, the salt marsh was a CO2 sink during daytime, mainly driven by light, and a CO2 source during night-time, mainly driven by temperature, irrespective of emersion or immersion periods. However, daytime immersion strongly affected NEE fluxes by reducing marsh CO2 uptake up to 90 %. During night-time immersion, marsh CO2 emissions could be completely suppressed, even causing a change in metabolic status from source to sink under certain situations, especially in winter when Reco rates were lowest. At the annual scale, tidal immersion did not significantly affect the net C uptake of the studied salt marsh since similar annual balances of measured NEE (with tidal immersion) and estimated NEEmarsh (without tidal immersion) were recorded.

Licence CC-BY
Full Text
File Pages Size Access
Publisher's official version 24 5 MB Open access
Supplement 6 850 KB Open access
Preprint 40 3 MB Open access
Top of the page

How to cite 

Mayen Jeremy, Polsenaere Pierre, Lamaud Éric, Arnaud Marie, Kostyrka Pierre, Bonnefond Jean-Marc, Geairon Philippe, Gernigon Julien, Chassagne Romain, Lacoue-Labarthe Thomas, Regaudie De Gioux Aurore, Souchu Philippe (2024). Atmospheric CO2 exchanges measured by eddy covariance over a temperate salt marsh and influence of environmental controlling factors. Biogeosciences, 21(4), 993-1016. Publisher's official version : https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-993-2024 , Open Access version : https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00882/99396/