Geographical differences in habitat relationships of cetaceans across an ocean basin

Type Article
Date 2020-08
Language English
Author(s) Mannocci Laura1, 2, Roberts Jason J.2, Pedersen Eric J.3, Halpin Patrick N.2
Affiliation(s) 1 : MARBEC, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD Sète France
2 : Marine Geospatial Ecology Laboratory, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke Univ. Durham NC USA
3 : Dept of Biology, Concordia Univ. Montreal QC Canada
Source Ecography (0906-7590) (Wiley), 2020-08 , Vol. 43 , N. 8 , P. 1250-1259
DOI 10.1111/ecog.04979
WOS© Times Cited 1
Keyword(s) environmental predictors, geographical variation, habitat relationships, highly mobile marine species, North Atlantic Ocean, species distribution modeling
Abstract

The distributions of highly mobile marine species such as cetaceans are increasingly modeled at basin scale by combining data from multiple regions. However, these basin‐wide models often overlook geographical variations in species habitat relationships between regions. We tested for geographical variations in habitat relationships for a suite of cetacean taxa between the two sides of the North Atlantic basin. Using cetacean visual survey data and remote sensing data from the western and eastern basin in summer, we related the probability of presence of twelve cetacean taxa from three guilds to seafloor depth, sea surface temperature and primary productivity. In a generalized additive model framework, we fitted 1) basin‐wide (BW) models, assuming a single global relationship, 2) region‐specific intercepts (RI) models, assuming relationships with the same shape in both regions, but allowing a region‐specific intercept and 3) region‐specific shape (RS) models, assuming relationships with different shapes between regions. RS models mostly yielded significantly better fits than BW models, indicating cetacean occurrences were better modeled with region‐specific than with global relationships. The better fits of RS models over RI models further provided statistical evidence for differences in the shapes of region‐specific relationships. Baleen whales showed striking differences in both the shapes of relationships and their mean presence probabilities between regions. Deep diving whales and delphinoids showed contrasting relationships between regions with few exceptions (e.g. non‐statistically different shapes of region‐specific relationships for harbor porpoise and beaked whales with depth). Our findings stress the need to account for geographical differences in habitat relationships between regions when modeling species distributions from combined data at the basin scale. Our proposed hypotheses offer a roadmap for understanding why habitat relationships may geographically vary in cetaceans and other highly mobile marine species.

Full Text
File Pages Size Access
Publisher's official version 10 2 MB Open access
Appendix 1–7 8 MB Open access
Top of the page