Decline in plankton diversity and carbon flux with reduced sea ice extent along the Western Antarctic Peninsula

Since the middle of the past century, the Western Antarctic Peninsula has warmed rapidly with a significant loss of sea ice but the impacts on plankton biodiversity and carbon cycling remain an open question. Here, using a 5-year dataset of eukaryotic plankton DNA metabarcoding, we assess changes in biodiversity and net community production in this region. Our results show that sea-ice extent is a dominant factor influencing eukaryotic plankton community composition, biodiversity, and net community production. Species richness and evenness decline with an increase in sea surface temperature (SST). In regions with low SST and shallow mixed layers, the community was dominated by a diverse assemblage of diatoms and dinoflagellates. Conversely, less diverse plankton assemblages were observed in waters with higher SST and/or deep mixed layers when sea ice extent was lower. A genetic programming machine-learning model explained up to 80% of the net community production variability at the Western Antarctic Peninsula. Among the biological explanatory variables, the sea-ice environment associated plankton assemblage is the best predictor of net community production. We conclude that eukaryotic plankton diversity and carbon cycling at the Western Antarctic Peninsula are strongly linked to sea-ice conditions.

Full Text

FilePagesSizeAccess
Publisher's official version
91 Mo
Supplementary information
102 Mo
Description of Additional Supplementary Files
-13 Ko
Supplementary Data 1
-22 Ko
Supplementary Data 2
-161 Ko
Supplementary Data 3
-104 Ko
Supplementary Data 4
-26 Ko
Reporting Summary
3255 Ko
Source Data
-132 Ko
How to cite
Lin Yajuan, Moreno Carly, Marchetti Adrian, Ducklow Hugh, Schofield Oscar, Delage Erwan, Meredith Michael, Li Zuchuan, Eveillard Damien, Chaffron Samuel, Cassar Nicolas (2021). Decline in plankton diversity and carbon flux with reduced sea ice extent along the Western Antarctic Peninsula. Nature Communications. 12 (1). 4948 (9p.). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25235-w, https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00718/83033/

Copy this text