The evolution and ecology of multiple antipredator defences
Type | Article | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date | 2023-07 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Language | English | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Author(s) | Kikuchi David W.1, 2, Allen William L.3, Arbuckle Kevin3, Aubier Thomas G.4, 5, Briolat Emmanuelle S.6, Burdfield‐steel Emily R.7, Cheney Karen L.8, Daňková Klára9, Elias Marianne10, 11, Hämäläinen Liisa12, Herberstein Marie E.12, Hossie Thomas J.13, Joron Mathieu14, Kunte Krushnamegh15, Leavell Brian C.16, Lindstedt Carita17, Lorioux‐chevalier Ugo18, McClure Melanie18, McLellan Callum F.19, Medina Iliana20, Nawge Viraj15, Páez Erika10, Pal Arka15, Pekár Stano21, Penacchio Olivier22, 23, Raška Jan9, Reader Tom24, Rojas Bibiana25, 26, Rönkä Katja H.27, 28, Rößler Daniela C.29, 30, Rowe Candy31, Rowland Hannah M.32, Roy Arlety18, Schaal Kaitlin A.33, Sherratt Thomas N.34, Skelhorn John31, Smart Hannah R.35, Stankowich Ted36, Stefan Amanda M.33, Summers Kyle37, Taylor Christopher H.24, Thorogood Rose27, 28, Umbers Kate35, 38, Winters Anne E., Yeager Justin6, 39, Exnerová Alice9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Affiliation(s) | 1 : Department of Integrative Biology Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon ,USA 2 : Evolutionary Biology Universität Bielefeld Bielefeld ,Germany 3 : Department of Biosciences Swansea University Swansea ,UK 4 : Department of Biology University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina, USA 5 : Laboratoire Évolution & Diversité Biologique Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, UMR 5174, CNRS/IRD Toulouse ,France 6 : Centre for Ecology and Conservation University of Exeter Penryn, UK 7 : Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics University of Amsterdam Amsterdam ,The Netherlands 8 : School of Biological Sciences The University of Queensland St Lucia Queensland, Australia 9 : Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science Charles University Prague ,Czech Republic 10 : Institut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité CNRS, MNHN, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, Université des Antilles Paris ,France 11 : Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Gamboa ,Panama 12 : School of Natural Sciences Macquarie University Sydney New South Wales, Australia 13 : Department of Biology Trent University Peterborough Ontario ,Canada 14 : CEFE Université de Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD Montpellier, France 15 : National Centre for Biological Sciences Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Bengaluru ,India 16 : Department of Biological Sciences Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana ,USA 17 : Department of Forest Sciences University of Helsinki Helsinki ,Finland 18 : Laboratoire Écologie, Évolution, Interactions des Systèmes Amazoniens (LEEISA) Université de Guyane, CNRS, IFREMER Cayenne ,France 19 : School of Biological Sciences University of Bristol Bristol ,UK 20 : School of BioSciences University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria ,Australia 21 : Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science Masaryk University Brno, Czech Republic 22 : School of Psychology and Neuroscience University of St Andrews St Andrews, UK 23 : Computer Vision Center, Computer Science Department Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona ,Spain 24 : School of Life Sciences University of Nottingham Nottingham ,UK 25 : Department of Interdisciplinary Life Sciences, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna ,Austria 26 : Department of Biology and Environmental Science University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylä ,Finland 27 : HiLIFE Helsinki Institute of Life Sciences University of Helsinki Helsinki, Finland 28 : Research Programme in Organismal & Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of Helsinki Helsinki ,Finland 29 : Zukunftskolleg University of Konstanz Konstanz ,Germany 30 : Department of Collective Behavior Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior Konstanz ,Germany 31 : Institute of Biosciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne, UK 32 : Max Planck Research Group Predators and Toxic Prey Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology Jena ,Germany 33 : Institute of Integrative Biology ETH Zurich Zurich ,Switzerland 34 : Department of Biology Carleton University Ottawa Ontario,Canada 35 : Hawkesbury Institute of the Environment Western Sydney University Penrith New South Wales ,Australia 36 : Department of Biological Sciences California State University Long Beach California ,USA 37 : Department of Biology East Carolina University Greenville North Carolina ,USA 38 : School of Science Western Sydney University Penrith New South Wales, Australia 39 : Grupo de Biodiversidad Medio Ambiente y Salud Universidad de Las Américas Quito ,Ecuador |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Source | Journal Of Evolutionary Biology (1010-061X) (Wiley), 2023-07 , Vol. 36 , N. 7 , P. 975-991 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOI | 10.1111/jeb.14192 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
WOS© Times Cited | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note | Special Issue: Evolution of multiple prey defences: From predator cognition to community ecology | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Keyword(s) | antergy, defence portfolio, defence syndrome, intraspecific variation, predation sequence, predator cognition, secondary defences, synergy, trade-offs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract | Prey seldom rely on a single type of antipredator defence, often using multiple defences to avoid predation. In many cases, selection in different contexts may favour the evolution of multiple defences in a prey. However, a prey may use multiple defences to protect itself during a single predator encounter. Such “defence portfolios” that defend prey against a single instance of predation are distributed across and within successive stages of the predation sequence (encounter, detection, identification, approach (attack), subjugation and consumption). We contend that at present, our understanding of defence portfolio evolution is incomplete, and seen from the fragmentary perspective of specific sensory systems (e.g., visual) or specific types of defences (especially aposematism). In this review, we aim to build a comprehensive framework for conceptualizing the evolution of multiple prey defences, beginning with hypotheses for the evolution of multiple defences in general, and defence portfolios in particular. We then examine idealized models of resource trade-offs and functional interactions between traits, along with evidence supporting them. We find that defence portfolios are constrained by resource allocation to other aspects of life history, as well as functional incompatibilities between different defences. We also find that selection is likely to favour combinations of defences that have synergistic effects on predator behaviour and prey survival. Next, we examine specific aspects of prey ecology, genetics and development, and predator cognition that modify the predictions of current hypotheses or introduce competing hypotheses. We outline schema for gathering data on the distribution of prey defences across species and geography, determining how multiple defences are produced, and testing the proximate mechanisms by which multiple prey defences impact predator behaviour. Adopting these approaches will strengthen our understanding of multiple defensive strategies. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Licence | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full Text |
|