Actions to halt biodiversity loss generally benefit the climate

Type Article
Date 2022-05
Language English
Author(s) Shin Yunne-JaiORCID1, Midgley G. F.2, Archer E.3, Arneth A.4, Barnes D. K. A.ORCID5, Chan L.6, Hashimoto S.7, Hoegh‐guldberg O.8, Insarov G.ORCID9, Leadley P.10, Levin L. A.ORCID11, Ngo H. T.12, Pandit R.13, 14, Pires A. P. F.ORCID15, Pörtner H. O.16, Rogers A. D.17, Scholes R. J.18, Settele J.19, 20, Smith P.ORCID21
Affiliation(s) 1 : MARBEC, IRD Univ Montpellier IFREMER CNRS 34000 Montpellier, France
2 : Global Change Biology Group, Botany and Zoology Department University of Stellenbosch 7600 Stellenbosch ,South Africa
3 : Department of Geography Geo‐Informatics and Meteorology University of Pretoria Lynnwood Road Hatfield, Pretoria 0002 ,South Africa
4 : Atmospheric Environmental Research Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) 82467 Garmisch‐Partenkirchen ,Germany
5 : British Antarctic Survey NERC Cambridge ,UK
6 : International Biodiversity Conservation Division National Parks Board 1 Cluny Road 259569 ,Singapore
7 : Dept. of Ecosystem Studies The University of Tokyo Tokyo 113‐8654,Japan
8 : School of Biological Sciences and ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies The University of Queensland Brisbane QLD 4072 ,Australia
9 : Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy for Sciences Moscow ,Russia
10 : Laboratoire d’Ecologie Systématique Evolution, Université Paris‐Saclay CNRS AgroParisTech 91400 Orsay ,France
11 : Center for Marine Biodiversity and Conservation and Integrative Oceanography Division Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California San Diego, USA
12 : Office of Climate Change, Biodiversity and Environment, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome ,Italy
13 : Centre for Environmental Economics and Policy ,UWA School of Agriculture and Environment The University of Western Australia Crawley WA 6009 ,Australia
14 : Global Center for Food, Land and Water Resources Research Faculty of Agriculture Hokkaido University Sapporo Hokkaido 060‐8589 ,Japan
15 : Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) ,Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
16 : Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research ,27515 Bremerhaven ,Germany
17 : REV Ocean, Lysaker, Norway
18 : Global Change Institute ,University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg ,South Africa
19 : Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Dept. Conservation Biology and Social‐Ecological Systems Halle ,Germany
20 : German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) ,Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig ,Germany
21 : Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen Aberdeen ,UK
Source Global Change Biology (1354-1013) (Wiley), 2022-05 , Vol. 28 , N. 9 , P. 2846-2874
DOI 10.1111/gcb.16109
WOS© Times Cited 38
Keyword(s) biodiversity conservation, carbon sequestration, climate change mitigation, convention on biological diversity, nature-based solutions, restoration
Abstract

The two most urgent and interlinked environmental challenges humanity faces are climate change and biodiversity loss. We are entering a pivotal decade for both the international biodiversity and climate change agendas with the sharpening of ambitious strategies and targets by the Convention on Biological Diversity and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Within their respective Conventions, the biodiversity and climate interlinked challenges have largely been addressed separately. There is evidence that conservation actions that halt, slow or reverse biodiversity loss can simultaneously slow anthropogenic mediated climate change significantly. This review highlights conservation actions which have the largest potential for mitigation of climate change. We note that conservation actions have mainly synergistic benefits and few antagonistic trade-offs with climate change mitigation. Specifically, we identify direct co-benefits in 14 out of the 21 action targets of the draft post-2020 global biodiversity framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity, notwithstanding the many indirect links that can also support both biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation. These relationships are context and scale-dependent; therefore, we showcase examples of local biodiversity conservation actions that can be incentivized, guided and prioritized by global objectives and targets. The close interlinkages between biodiversity, climate change mitigation, other nature’s contributions to people and good quality of life are seldom as integrated as they should be in management and policy. This review aims to re-emphasize the vital relationships between biodiversity conservation actions and climate change mitigation in a timely manner, in support to major Conferences of Parties that are about to negotiate strategic frameworks and international goals for the decades to come.

Full Text
File Pages Size Access
Publisher's official version 68 2 MB Open access
Supplementary Material 79 KB Open access
Top of the page

How to cite 

Shin Yunne-Jai, Midgley G. F., Archer E., Arneth A., Barnes D. K. A., Chan L., Hashimoto S., Hoegh‐guldberg O., Insarov G., Leadley P., Levin L. A., Ngo H. T., Pandit R., Pires A. P. F., Pörtner H. O., Rogers A. D., Scholes R. J., Settele J., Smith P. (2022). Actions to halt biodiversity loss generally benefit the climate. Global Change Biology, 28(9), 2846-2874. Publisher's official version : https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16109 , Open Access version : https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00749/86129/